da Internet has killed da Hollywood (and all kinds) of celebrity.

70,049
24,223
Joined
Aug 1, 2004

LOG IN | REGISTER

https://spectator.us/
Close
LOG IN | REGISTER

ARTS CINEMA LIFE
The age of celebrity is dead
The internet has killed the Hollywood star
Freddy Gray

oscars

February 10, 2020
10:09 AM
Come friendly bombs and fall on Hollywood, it isn’t fit for doing good. Another year, another dreadful Oscars, another round of moral lectures from the beautiful people. It’s all so tiresome. The only reason most people pay attention to these irritating award ceremonies is precisely so that they can be irritated.
So there was a vegan theme at this year’s Academy Awards. So the show had no host. So Brad Pitt is angry about impeachment. So someone said ‘workers of the world unite’. So Joaquin Phoenix is mad (in all senses) about what mankind is doing to the animal kingdom. So Natalie Portman, in what she called ‘my subtle way’, had the names of the women directors who weren’t nominated for awards sowed into her dress.
So what? All these people are ridiculous. Nothing they say makes any difference to anything. Actors are increasingly aware, thanks in part to Ricky Gervais’s wonderful ribbing of them at the Golden Globes, that nobody cares what they think. At some unconscious level, these actors must know that they don’t really know anything about politics or the real world. They can’t admit this to themselves, of course, human nature being what it is, so they double down. They convince themselves that any angry reaction to their moralizing is an indication that they have dared to speak truth. How brave they are! And so the infuriating cycle continues. Actors end up almost trolling the public, and the public trolls them back on social media.

The Oscars have always been fundamentally silly, but 10 years ago they were still a major event. Celebrities still lectured people in their annoying, self-congratulatory way, but they had more cultural capital. People listened when they spoke, and that slightly restrained their sanctimoniousness. Now they are just howling into cyberspace, ever more desperate to be heard.
Industry bores will tell you that the audience viewing figures are in fact up on last year: 29.6 million viewers and, yes, ABC sold their precious advertising spots for lots of money. But in 2000, the audience was 44.6 million, and 41 million in 2010, so the overall pattern is one of decline.
The internet has killed the Hollywood star. Fame has been disrupted. Andy Warhol got it slightly wrong when he said that in the future, everybody will be famous for 15 minutes. In fact, thanks to social media, everybody is famous to at least 15 people. Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook mean we don’t have to ogle stars anymore; we are too busy ogling ourselves. Yes, different types of celebrities have grown online: the influencers, the YouTubers, the streamers, and they too will try to use their position to grandstand. But the age of celebrity, of mass entertainers mattering as anything other than entertainment, is dying. It won’t be missed.
 
Good. Even though SM celebrities are only a half step up, regular celebrities are so guarded and manufactured you don’t know who they are. Word to Kevin Spacey.
 
I'm trying to think of folks that broke the YT or social media bubble and made it onto the scene. I know the most recent one is Lily Singh and her show is pretty bad. You can argue Donald Glover started with DerekComedy and is now a multi-media star...but his era of social media was a different landscape than today.

+1 to the point that social media has leveled the playing field more than ever. At the same time though when I think of Hollywood i think of long-format films that will have a lasting imprint as opposed to the slew of social media darlings that literally come and go. The allstars on IG/YT/TikTok are probably a different batch of folks that were on top in 2016.

...with that I don't really understand the article in its entirety. The first two paragraphs are literally just complaints about the empty-ness of celebrities but the through line at the end is....theres going to be more celebrities we can ignore now? Clearly celebrity status wasn't killed - just altered to widen the aperture more.
 
Works both ways it's cool not to give a **** about stars. But now every one is considered a " star" in their own world. I dont ever wanna give a **** about any ofthem.
 
Lily Singh pure garbage. She's local to us from Toronto, Canada and I don't know of anyone locally who has ever liked her content.
Who?

Edit: googled her. :lol: shes from the borough too and i still dunno who she is
 
people really on TikTok like that? :lol:

Yeah, you’re sleeping on how crazy popular the app is for the under-21 crowd. Even Bronny is on it. The trendiest social media app by far.

The big creator on there is Charli something. Getting 2 million likes on her IG. That type of engagement is bigger than almost all mainstream celebs and the biggest youtubers and it happened in just months. Kardashian/Ariana type numbers.

Really smart and well built app. Trends come and go really fast organically and any creator has a chance at gaining an audience the way the app is setup. It’s gonna get a lot more popular.
 
this all started from the MySpace days when Tila Tequila and Forbidden had more MySpace friends than the real celebs at the time, it's just more matured now
 
Back
Top Bottom