- 7,728
- 3,808
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2011
Originally Posted by Antidope
Originally Posted by goldenchild9
The original ruling was that they violated Ohio's civil rights laws.Originally Posted by Antidope
What was the original ruling, I didnt see it anywhere in the article or maybe I missed it.
How is that controversial? Thats what I would expect to happen
The incident was controversial, not the ruling.
The poster that said the ruling was controversial probably misspoke.