larrydavidswag
Banned
- 1,767
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
regardless of how UNLIKELY life on this planet is, ITS HERE....
so to say "its just so unlikely, it's more likely a make-believe god physically and literally made everything" is ridiculous....because unlikely or not, it happened....
you're saying if we tried to "replicate" the "expirament" we would 'fail"....
lets replicate the experiment of god....opps. can't do that, cause its god....so there isnt even a likelyhood, there's absolutely ZERO chance of discovering or "copying" god, right?
right.
now we're arguing the likelyhood of two very ridiculously unlikely things...replicating life on a planet other than earth
in fact, we're arguing which is MORE unlikely, reality, which is, reality....or a secondary reality where some unknown being created everything....
there's actually more evidence that it's random, than that it was created.
but cute, tho.
(if everything was created with intelligent design why are things born ******ed and deformed? why are there collisions in space which destroy things? lemme guess, "only god knows that answer", right?)
"check it, i cant dunk, but its more likely than you jumping 400 feet in the air, off vertical, tho..."
both have zero percent chance in happening....god creating everything is just as unlikely as everything beign an accident....thing is, it happened....you belive in SOMETHING, that god did it, which we both LOGICALLY agree has a zero chance to "reoccur" or "be duplicated"....athiests believe in "i really dont know", or "nothing", which is open to accept the possibilities of a wide-range of things that are all very unlikely...however, they don't commit to ONE "end-all-be-all" explaination.....for the most part, athiests admit they don't really know....they're just sure that they dont believe in something that has absolutely NO EVIDENCE of existing....
put it like this, saying that "random chance" is less likely than intelligent design is silly, to me....
because "random chance" included an infinite amount of varibles and different explainations....literally an infinite amount of factors could or couldnt be included in "random chance" or "nature" scenario....for example, coulda been asteroids which gave us water, coulda been aliens, coulda been a BILLION scenarios.....but it's still 'random nature", whereas, you think that a SPECIFIC scenario where a being, without any shread of evidence this being exists, literally created everything is MORE LIKELY than the INFINITE possibilities of "nature"?
alright.
that's called faith.
you haz it.
i do not.
so to say "its just so unlikely, it's more likely a make-believe god physically and literally made everything" is ridiculous....because unlikely or not, it happened....
you're saying if we tried to "replicate" the "expirament" we would 'fail"....
lets replicate the experiment of god....opps. can't do that, cause its god....so there isnt even a likelyhood, there's absolutely ZERO chance of discovering or "copying" god, right?
right.
now we're arguing the likelyhood of two very ridiculously unlikely things...replicating life on a planet other than earth
in fact, we're arguing which is MORE unlikely, reality, which is, reality....or a secondary reality where some unknown being created everything....
there's actually more evidence that it's random, than that it was created.
but cute, tho.
(if everything was created with intelligent design why are things born ******ed and deformed? why are there collisions in space which destroy things? lemme guess, "only god knows that answer", right?)
"check it, i cant dunk, but its more likely than you jumping 400 feet in the air, off vertical, tho..."
both have zero percent chance in happening....god creating everything is just as unlikely as everything beign an accident....thing is, it happened....you belive in SOMETHING, that god did it, which we both LOGICALLY agree has a zero chance to "reoccur" or "be duplicated"....athiests believe in "i really dont know", or "nothing", which is open to accept the possibilities of a wide-range of things that are all very unlikely...however, they don't commit to ONE "end-all-be-all" explaination.....for the most part, athiests admit they don't really know....they're just sure that they dont believe in something that has absolutely NO EVIDENCE of existing....
put it like this, saying that "random chance" is less likely than intelligent design is silly, to me....
because "random chance" included an infinite amount of varibles and different explainations....literally an infinite amount of factors could or couldnt be included in "random chance" or "nature" scenario....for example, coulda been asteroids which gave us water, coulda been aliens, coulda been a BILLION scenarios.....but it's still 'random nature", whereas, you think that a SPECIFIC scenario where a being, without any shread of evidence this being exists, literally created everything is MORE LIKELY than the INFINITE possibilities of "nature"?
alright.
that's called faith.
you haz it.
i do not.