- 3,340
- 12
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2005
Originally Posted by Mo Matik
Well written and well supported article.
http://www.huffingtonpost...gument-for_b_831185.html
I posit to you that all the evidence points, in an obvious and inextricable way, to a supernatural explanation for the origin of life. If there are no known naturalistic explanations and the likelihood that "chance" played any role is wildly minute, then it is a perfectly reasonable position to take that a conscious super-intelligence (that some of us call God) was the architect of life on this planet. Everyone agrees to the appearance of design. It is illogical to assume its non-design in the absence of evidence to the contrary.
Again? The same old tired argument that science hasn't explained everything yet means that God created us? really? again? What support did he bring to his views? That a few scientists believe in a creator? That's it?@ "well supported"
Reasonable? Is that the best that a rabbi could come up with? He didn't support his theory idea that a God created us with any actual evidence at all. Now think if he brought HIS God into this? dude would get ripped to shreds.
This is his argument:
"All evidence" obviously shows that God created us.
Science hasn't shown us enough evidence to the contrary.
Conclusion: God created us.
If science knew everything, IT WOULD HAVE STOPPED ALREADY.