- 4,052
- 1,210
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2011
beat me to it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
beat me to it
She's a walking skeleton...I would smash even with her personal beliefs tho.
excuse my ignorance but...
maybe thats why I wanna bone?She's a walking skeleton...I would smash even with her personal beliefs tho.
View media item 219114i see what you didmaybe thats why I wanna bone? :\
There comes a point where we can't excuse people and say 'she's not racist'. If she spews racist and jingoistic ideology, even if only for shock factor, I see no problem with labeling such a person a racist... they might just be slick about it but their words have weight, and they should be held accountable for those words.
Lol. Like the New York Times and NBC are not just as bad?Woah there I'm not excusing her. Just rationalizing her actions. I personally could not make money in that way
I think it might be even worse than racism. She makes a conscious choice to make money off of bigots.
Maybe she's racist. Maybe she's evil and not racist.
I just meant that we shouldn't be surprised at this. It's for shock value. it's "entertainment" for a certain part of the population.
The way that fox news riles people up and plays on their fears and hatred is despicable, offensive, and it should be illegal to have "news" in their slogan.
Lol. Like the New York Times and NBC are not just as bad?
No she is not right. She is saying that race, or as she puts it "diversity", is what causes gun violence. Just because minorities are more likely to commit violent crimes doesn't mean that race is the cause. Correlation =/= Causation. You can't make such a conclusion because there are many underlying factors to that statistic, like economic and educational factors. If she was arguing that there needs to be some change in minority communities and even government policies so that the statistic could drop, I would agree, but she is not. She is clearly taking a stance against minorities and doesn't want to help minorities.
NBC promotes emotional knee jerk reactions all the time without apology. The only difference is that they're a lot more coy about it and don't use the angry yelling person approach.No, They aren't. Not in the same ball park if you wanna talk about race baiting and fear mongeringLol. Like the New York Times and NBC are not just as bad?
Obama gave someone a pound and they called it a terrorist fist jab
They went crazy when the first lady wanted to curb childhood obesity, claiming she was indoctrinating the youth
They called Obama a Marxist and claimed he isn't even American. he's as centrist as you can get. Obama is FAR from the liberal they portray.
Glen beck called Obama a racist.
I'm sure if I did research I could come up with dozens of more examples. This is off my head
NBC promotes emotional knee jerk reactions all the time without apology. The only difference is that they're a lot more coy about it and don't use the angry yelling person approach.
I know you're pretty far left, but Obama being a centrist? Socially, he's liberal. Economically, he's Keynesian.
**** that white ****.
it gets to charge those rates because its just plain more entertaining, fact is I'm sure I lean toward the liberal side, but I'd much rather watch oreilly than any other cable news show. the ratings don't reflect ideology, as the past election showed.No, she's famous because she's controversial. She says what she needs to in order to get people riled up on both sides. It's the same with Fox news. I'm convinced that half of its ratings are from people looking to point out its flaws and say how horrible it is. As a result, it gets higher ratings and gets to charge higher prices to advertisers.