- 34,637
- 27,994
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2002
They strike me as a very fancy step down model.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I truly believe this is a 35. I hope I am wrong. That E plate reminds me of a 70s ash tray. Trust me I got plenty of dads old stuff to legit this claim.
Anybody ever stop and ask themselves why in the entire Stevie Wonder **** would Braille be on the side of a basketball shoe?
C’mon man - let these ****s DIE already...
Anybody ever stop and ask themselves why in the entire Stevie Wonder **** would Braille be on the side of a basketball shoe?
C’mon man - let these ****s DIE already...
I gotta stick with my gut and still say I think these are the 35s, whatever they are I very much like them and want a pair.. But yes I do think it’s weird that they look so much like the 5s like you said, because I seem to remember seeing an interview with someone at JB shortly after the 34 release where they said the new models aren’t gonna be based on old ones much at all anymore. I don’t remember if it was Tate or who, but someone said that.The reason I’m still holding out saying it’s not is there’s too much 5 influence after they went away from that with the 33 and 34. They only had subtle callbacks which was great. There’s just too much 5 in this. If they are it, I gotta see some detailed product shots before I judge completely.
I call bs on that name. It has 35 in Braille right there on the new eclipse plate lol Even PJ Tucker said the Lebron 17 wasn’t the Lebron 17. I appreciate the pic by solebyjc but now they’re just playing games with us.
Your right it does! I figured this out a few weeks ago. Even posted about it. I completely forgot the specifics of what it said. Ugh. Anyway, yes, 30 years since 1990. My guess is term Talon was the internal code name for the AJ35.the Braille or Morse code or whatever says 1990-2020 not 35.
I still believe it’s the 35. Too much put into it for it to be a takedown model. Plus, that Nike Air tag on the back, no way they are putting Nike Air on a takedown model. They love slapping Jumpman’s on everything too much to do that.I gotta stick with my gut and still say I think these are the 35s, whatever they are I very much like them and want a pair.. But yes I do think it’s weird that they look so much like the 5s like you said, because I seem to remember seeing an interview with someone at JB shortly after the 34 release where they said the new models aren’t gonna be based on old ones much at all anymore. I don’t remember if it was Tate or who, but someone said that.
CLOT and Fragment gonna do a collab on the same team jordan model. I think not. These are them