devildog1776
Banned
- 4,949
- 139
I dont buy J's no more because the leather is trizzash and the midsoles are weaksauce....
all the youngins can eat this up...
all the youngins can eat this up...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And it's people like you that become redundant by saying the same thing over and over. We've known for two months that the grey was going to be darker than the 99s.But you can't judge the quality of a sneaker based on pics. The Militarys from 06 looked good in pics and as we all know were a trainwreck in person.Originally Posted by SoleAddict34
Its hilarious you're trying to defend a obviously poorly executed retro. "But it's darker than the 99s"...what does that mean?lol It still looks like crap. Its fine for you to settle for a less esthetically pleasing version of this shoe which, no doubt, JB doesn't reallyOriginally Posted by sthebest
But it's darker than the 99s. If you don't want the 2012s, thats fine because its more than enough cracked pairs of 99s where you can do a sole swap. All you dudes sound are crying like Keith Sweat because things aren't like you remember them to be. Build a bridge and get over it.Originally Posted by SoleAddict34
Sooo....you guys think these are OG shades??
compared to 1989 OGs
Guess I'm colorblind cuz no way are those anywhere near OG shade....
care to get right. But for people like you that eat up anything JB craps out to call others that appreciate a well executed retro "cry babies" is hypocritical to the whole idea of a website dedicated to discussing what makes a shoe good or bad.
And it's people like you that become redundant by saying the same thing over and over. We've known for two months that the grey was going to be darker than the 99s.But you can't judge the quality of a sneaker based on pics. The Militarys from 06 looked good in pics and as we all know were a trainwreck in person.Originally Posted by SoleAddict34
Its hilarious you're trying to defend a obviously poorly executed retro. "But it's darker than the 99s"...what does that mean?lol It still looks like crap. Its fine for you to settle for a less esthetically pleasing version of this shoe which, no doubt, JB doesn't reallyOriginally Posted by sthebest
But it's darker than the 99s. If you don't want the 2012s, thats fine because its more than enough cracked pairs of 99s where you can do a sole swap. All you dudes sound are crying like Keith Sweat because things aren't like you remember them to be. Build a bridge and get over it.Originally Posted by SoleAddict34
Sooo....you guys think these are OG shades??
compared to 1989 OGs
Guess I'm colorblind cuz no way are those anywhere near OG shade....
care to get right. But for people like you that eat up anything JB craps out to call others that appreciate a well executed retro "cry babies" is hypocritical to the whole idea of a website dedicated to discussing what makes a shoe good or bad.
that wouldn't matter much to me personally since the grey is solid on those. these, however, had a nice contrast with dark splatter over light grey.Originally Posted by rusty84
If black cements also release next year what makes us the they wont be Black/Tech grey?
...but maybe complaining will get them to throw us a bone once in a while.Originally Posted by sthebest
^ I know that in whatever capacity the White/Cement IVs release, its never going to please everyone. That's pretty much a given. If if they get the color right, the quality isnt going to match up to the 99s and neither is the shape.
But I give up. People are entitled to their opinions and I can see why purists hate these. Complaining isnt going to make Jordan Brand produce a 100% accurate version of the Cement IVs. I just know that I like them and will pick them up.
cough it up, mister. i see you...Originally Posted by green rhino123
^
you don't know as much as you think you do
that wouldn't matter much to me personally since the grey is solid on those. these, however, had a nice contrast with dark splatter over light grey.Originally Posted by rusty84
If black cements also release next year what makes us the they wont be Black/Tech grey?
...but maybe complaining will get them to throw us a bone once in a while.Originally Posted by sthebest
^ I know that in whatever capacity the White/Cement IVs release, its never going to please everyone. That's pretty much a given. If if they get the color right, the quality isnt going to match up to the 99s and neither is the shape.
But I give up. People are entitled to their opinions and I can see why purists hate these. Complaining isnt going to make Jordan Brand produce a 100% accurate version of the Cement IVs. I just know that I like them and will pick them up.
cough it up, mister. i see you...Originally Posted by green rhino123
^
you don't know as much as you think you do
This coming from a guy whining about the quality of the IIIs in the black/cement thread.Originally Posted by sthebest
And it's people like you that become redundant by saying the same thing over and over. We've known for two months that the grey was going to be darker than the 99s.But you can't judge the quality of a sneaker based on pics. The Militarys from 06 looked good in pics and as we all know were a trainwreck in person.Originally Posted by SoleAddict34
Its hilarious you're trying to defend a obviously poorly executed retro. "But it's darker than the 99s"...what does that mean?lol It still looks like crap. Its fine for you to settle for a less esthetically pleasing version of this shoe which, no doubt, JB doesn't reallyOriginally Posted by sthebest
But it's darker than the 99s. If you don't want the 2012s, thats fine because its more than enough cracked pairs of 99s where you can do a sole swap. All you dudes sound are crying like Keith Sweat because things aren't like you remember them to be. Build a bridge and get over it.
care to get right. But for people like you that eat up anything JB craps out to call others that appreciate a well executed retro "cry babies" is hypocritical to the whole idea of a website dedicated to discussing what makes a shoe good or bad.
As much as you whine and complain, White/Cement IVs in the manner you want them in are NEVER coming back so you might as well get used to it.
You must have me confused with someone else. I said that the Black/Cement IIIs had areas where they cut corners, buy my pair was good quality and without defects. And fall back son, I'm not some newbie who just started buying Jordans yesterday. I have retros and OGs dating back to Is from 1985, so I know a thing or two about quality. But you don't see me pulling an Aaliyah and writing a four page letter about Jordan Brand's declining quality.Originally Posted by SoleAddict34
This coming from a guy whining about the quality of the IIIs in the black/cement thread.Originally Posted by sthebest
And it's people like you that become redundant by saying the same thing over and over. We've known for two months that the grey was going to be darker than the 99s.But you can't judge the quality of a sneaker based on pics. The Militarys from 06 looked good in pics and as we all know were a trainwreck in person.Originally Posted by SoleAddict34
Its hilarious you're trying to defend a obviously poorly executed retro. "But it's darker than the 99s"...what does that mean?lol It still looks like crap. Its fine for you to settle for a less esthetically pleasing version of this shoe which, no doubt, JB doesn't really
care to get right. But for people like you that eat up anything JB craps out to call others that appreciate a well executed retro "cry babies" is hypocritical to the whole idea of a website dedicated to discussing what makes a shoe good or bad.
As much as you whine and complain, White/Cement IVs in the manner you want them in are NEVER coming back so you might as well get used to it.Just eat up the crap JB is feeding you and stop whining like us 'cry babies'...