- 37,827
- 15,636
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by pr0phecy718
at those multiple posts
Originally Posted by pr0phecy718
at those multiple posts
Originally Posted by beh235
Ok. And give me other examples of how complaining has worked since then? Be honest, I think they changed that because the infrared blocking was truly horrendous. Those pair are only worth money because it was changed, but had they released people wouldn't have liked them.Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Originally Posted by beh235
It's threads like this that make us seem like sneaker nerds. People, it's not that hard. You like, you buy. You don't like, leave it be. What good is complaining about a shoe six months out from when it's due to release based on a sample pic? Makes no sense to me, but I guess the newer "collectors" are younger. Maybe it's me. Meh....
Because if we all stay silent the chance of makingThem change is almost like zero.If enough people give a bad feedback,There is still a chance of causing a change.Remember the 2000 VI retros black/infareds,They were meant to be retro plus withMuch red at the front midsoleand a red nike air logo, but got changedSlightly before release.
Originally Posted by beh235
Ok. And give me other examples of how complaining has worked since then? Be honest, I think they changed that because the infrared blocking was truly horrendous. Those pair are only worth money because it was changed, but had they released people wouldn't have liked them.Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Originally Posted by beh235
It's threads like this that make us seem like sneaker nerds. People, it's not that hard. You like, you buy. You don't like, leave it be. What good is complaining about a shoe six months out from when it's due to release based on a sample pic? Makes no sense to me, but I guess the newer "collectors" are younger. Maybe it's me. Meh....
Because if we all stay silent the chance of makingThem change is almost like zero.If enough people give a bad feedback,There is still a chance of causing a change.Remember the 2000 VI retros black/infareds,They were meant to be retro plus withMuch red at the front midsoleand a red nike air logo, but got changedSlightly before release.
Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Originally Posted by beh235
Ok. And give me other examples of how complaining has worked since then? Be honest, I think they changed that because the infrared blocking was truly horrendous. Those pair are only worth money because it was changed, but had they released people wouldn't have liked them.Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Because if we all stay silent the chance of making Them change is almost like zero. If enough people give a bad feedback, There is still a chance of causing a change. Remember the 2000 VI retros black/infareds, They were meant to be retro plus with Much red at the front midsole and a red nike air logo, but got changed Slightly before release.
It surely depends on the product manager what colorways Are being released or changed. The worst thing is That someone decided since 2002 that all Nike logos got replaced by the jumpman and That most retros are done with intenionally Changed design features and color blocking. Just hope that the guy in charge changes the Direction in favor for the fans. so they could earn more money and the Sneakerheads who spend much money wont skip so often. I already skipped all 3s of this year And most likely skip the concords Because the jumpman on the left shoe looks ******ed.
Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Originally Posted by beh235
Ok. And give me other examples of how complaining has worked since then? Be honest, I think they changed that because the infrared blocking was truly horrendous. Those pair are only worth money because it was changed, but had they released people wouldn't have liked them.Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Because if we all stay silent the chance of making Them change is almost like zero. If enough people give a bad feedback, There is still a chance of causing a change. Remember the 2000 VI retros black/infareds, They were meant to be retro plus with Much red at the front midsole and a red nike air logo, but got changed Slightly before release.
It surely depends on the product manager what colorways Are being released or changed. The worst thing is That someone decided since 2002 that all Nike logos got replaced by the jumpman and That most retros are done with intenionally Changed design features and color blocking. Just hope that the guy in charge changes the Direction in favor for the fans. so they could earn more money and the Sneakerheads who spend much money wont skip so often. I already skipped all 3s of this year And most likely skip the concords Because the jumpman on the left shoe looks ******ed.
Originally Posted by memphisboi55
Originally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky
I've seen Steve and Barry coats with better leather
Originally Posted by memphisboi55
Originally Posted by UptownsDotNetStacky
I've seen Steve and Barry coats with better leather