- 533
- 12
The $160 price tag shouldnt come as a surprise. Some of the retros in 2011 started carrying a $160 price tag. Its JBs way of preparing you for the price change across the board.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by beh235
It's threads like this that make us seem like sneaker nerds. People, it's not that hard. You like, you buy. You don't like, leave it be. What good is complaining about a shoe six months out from when it's due to release based on a sample pic? Makes no sense to me, but I guess the newer "collectors" are younger. Maybe it's me. Meh....
Originally Posted by beh235
It's threads like this that make us seem like sneaker nerds. People, it's not that hard. You like, you buy. You don't like, leave it be. What good is complaining about a shoe six months out from when it's due to release based on a sample pic? Makes no sense to me, but I guess the newer "collectors" are younger. Maybe it's me. Meh....
Did it look like the 99s?Originally Posted by solezprogression
I saw the samples of these in GS today in person. Looked pretty good. I can't wait to see the men's version.
Did it look like the 99s?Originally Posted by solezprogression
I saw the samples of these in GS today in person. Looked pretty good. I can't wait to see the men's version.
Originally Posted by solezprogression
I saw the samples of these in GS today in person. Looked pretty good. I can't wait to see the men's version.
Originally Posted by solezprogression
I saw the samples of these in GS today in person. Looked pretty good. I can't wait to see the men's version.
Ok. And give me other examples of how complaining has worked since then? Be honest, I think they changed that because the infrared blocking was truly horrendous. Those pair are only worth money because it was changed, but had they released people wouldn't have liked them.Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Originally Posted by beh235
It's threads like this that make us seem like sneaker nerds. People, it's not that hard. You like, you buy. You don't like, leave it be. What good is complaining about a shoe six months out from when it's due to release based on a sample pic? Makes no sense to me, but I guess the newer "collectors" are younger. Maybe it's me. Meh....
Because if we all stay silent the chance of makingThem change is almost like zero.If enough people give a bad feedback,There is still a chance of causing a change.Remember the 2000 VI retros black/infareds,They were meant to be retro plus withMuch red at the front midsoleand a red nike air logo, but got changedSlightly before release.
Ok. And give me other examples of how complaining has worked since then? Be honest, I think they changed that because the infrared blocking was truly horrendous. Those pair are only worth money because it was changed, but had they released people wouldn't have liked them.Originally Posted by jumpman cbt2
Originally Posted by beh235
It's threads like this that make us seem like sneaker nerds. People, it's not that hard. You like, you buy. You don't like, leave it be. What good is complaining about a shoe six months out from when it's due to release based on a sample pic? Makes no sense to me, but I guess the newer "collectors" are younger. Maybe it's me. Meh....
Because if we all stay silent the chance of makingThem change is almost like zero.If enough people give a bad feedback,There is still a chance of causing a change.Remember the 2000 VI retros black/infareds,They were meant to be retro plus withMuch red at the front midsoleand a red nike air logo, but got changedSlightly before release.