- 11,959
- 6,203
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
If I was in that store when ol' boy broke out his 2000 pair I would have IMMEDIATELY asked what his NT profile name was I would have expected it to be a member here without question
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Still want to wait for official photos, but this is the breakdown for me.
Pros:
No banana shape (that I can clearly see)
NA on back
Overall shape is better (not as much of a low top)
CW is one of the all time greats
Cons:
Toebox fat af
NA on back
Tongue tall af
Red part of tongue is visible
No gray/white lines
Overall shape still misses the mark
Know I’m missing other things an OG/99 enthusiasts would spot. But all these flaws and I’m still copping because it’s such an iconic shoe. 3s & 4s used to be my favorite Jordans until they started butchering the shape and they became these bulky monstrosities. We frfr need a viral movement to #SaveThe4s #Make4sGreatAgain and just troll/spam Nike and JB. People we deserve an authentic OG 3 & 4. That is why today, I am announcing my candidacy for President of the United States of America. Running on the platform of shoe equity and equality for all Jordan and Nike retros. Nah
Interesting. “AIR” is perfectly centered under NIKE on my pair.
Can't really tell with angle, but the wing being higher than the height of the shoe tony posted might be because the laces are tightened at the top. The top three lace holes look like they're pulled pretty tight.
Gray lines are there. These guys want bright white lines.
For all the toddlers that been waiting for official pics lol
For all the toddlers that been waiting for official pics lol
Cocaine. It's a hell of a drugWhat are these "white lines" everyone speaks of?