Air Jordan III OG Black Cement returns Feb 2018 - Nike Air on the back

[0takusamsay]

When white cements drop all they gotta do is do what they been doing with these new molds for elephant print and I'd be ok as long as its light gray on dark gray

Nobody knows what you're talking about at this point and I don't think you do either.

He's adamant about calling the OG's trash.

 

[BennyIll22]

When white cements drop all they gotta do is use


He's adamant about calling the OG's trash.

I mean he's posted pictures that weren't the years he claimed then to be and he's pretending the OG shape isn't clearly what it visibly is.

It's safe to say he doesn't know what he's talking about.

 

[rbk93]

Nobody knows what you're talking about at this point and I don't think you do either.

Agree to disagree.

The shape isn't appealing to me.

 

[SuperQ]

Fam, hes either clearly trolling or stupid. Either way, we shouldnt feed him

 

[JRepp23]

Agree to disagree.

The shape isn't appealing to me.

And you can do that. The late aquamanjay never liked the original form of the 3 either and he took some heat for it. You know how guys in here feel about this shoe. Sometimes you gotta say your peace and move on. Your opinion is all good, but trying to justify it over and over again will not get you anywhere. We all love 3s.

 

[Girl Thats Jules]

Of all the Jordan III iterations you're calling out the 2001 & 2003's?

I'll take the toes from those 2 years over what we've witnessed the past 15 or so years.

The toe from past 2 years is better than the toes on the 2001-2003.

I've posted pics here before. I have doubles of all of the 2001s and 2003s and 5-6 pairs with this new shape. I've compared almost all of them.

This new toe is definitely better.

 

[1978S]

The toe from past 2 years is better than the toes on the 2001-2003.

I've posted pics here before. I have doubles of all of the 2001s and 2003s and 5-6 pairs with this new shape. I've compared almost all of them.

This new toe is definitely better.

You just randomly called out the 2001's & 2003's though with no context, and never mentioned anything about the newer III's and their toes. Yes they've improved, but you should have added context so we can understand what you're talking about.

HOWEVER, let's be clear about what I actually said in my reply to you........ that the 2001 & 2003 toes were better than what we've gotten over the past 15 or so years. Yes the recent updates are good....but we've been suffering for almost 20 years.

 

[Girl Thats Jules]

1. But they're not better than the toes from the last 2 years, so isn't that included in "the last 15 years"?

2. Also I didn't know I had to follow a narrative here I can't say what I want to say?

 

[1978S]

1. But they're not better than the toes from the last 2 years, so isn't that included in "the last 15 years"?

2. Also I didn't know I had to follow a narrative here I can't say what I want to say?

1. I never said they were better. And I specifically put the last 15 years "or so" specifically because of this.

2. You can, but just put context and be clear next time instead of making random statements. This way there will be no confusion next time.

 

[rafbuddy]

The georgetown 3s uncs the blue Smurf joints are all pleather. Jb loves sellin trash

 

[Girl Thats Jules]

Time to debunk some narratives and re-write the canon.

The current shape is the best shape since the OG.

The current toe is better than the 1994-2001-2003.

This is the closest we've been to the OG 1988 shape.

Quality is another issue


2021 on left, 2003 on right that I actually ironed in the past to try and flatten as they were much higher before.

 

[rainking]

Time to debunk some narratives and re-write the canon.

The current shape is the best shape since the OG.

The current toe is better than the 1994-2001-2003.

This is the closest we've been to the OG 1988 shape.

Quality is another issue


2003 on right

I sold all my 2003s seven years ago so I can’t compare anymore. Maybe you should include more comparison pics rather than just mostly pics of the latest releases. Just a thought. Are the statements you posted what you consider as truth or are those the myths you’re attempting to debunk?

 

[Girl Thats Jules]

I sold all my 2003s seven years ago so I can’t compare anymore. Maybe you should include more comparison pics rather than just mostly pics of the latest releases. Just a thought. Are the statements you posted what you consider as truth or are those the myths you’re attempting to debunk?

Just trying to debunk that the 94-2001-2003 retros have the best shape.

I was thinking about putting more comparison pics but just looking at the 94s and 2001s in this thread on the last two pages: it's obvious they don't have this same shape, just look at the toes.
I don't think comparisons are really needed.

 

[rob1ne]

The correct height still isnt there, plus that og/94 thin ep must be brought back for them to look legit.

 

[rainking]

Just trying to debunk that the 94-2001-2003 retros have the best shape.

I was thinking about putting more comparison pics but just looking at the 94s and 2001s in this thread on the last two pages: it's obvious they don't have this same shape, just look at the toes.
I don't think comparisons are really needed.

I’m not arguing with ya, was just clarifying your meaning. The ‘94s weren’t an exact copy of the OG but I still think the overall shape of the shoe might’ve been a bit better. But yeah these new ones are pretty solid. If they’d just fix the collar a bit more and change the main base gray color and lighten lines of the EP, we’d really be right there.

 

[Quiggles706]

Man that shape is horrendous. Crazy part is if it was reversed, OGs looked more like the 2018 and the 2018 looked exactly like these pictures… how many people would be glorifying the OGs. Only thing I want back is the slim EP.

Honestly don’t care if I’m in the minority, but I can say I owned them in 1988.

 

[rainking]

Man that shape is horrendous. Crazy part is if it was reversed, OGs looked more like the 2018 and the 2018 looked exactly like these pictures… how many people would be glorifying the OGs. Only thing I want back is the slim EP.

Honestly don’t care if I’m in the minority, but I can say I owned them in 1988.

Man, you’re nuts

 

[picasso swerve]

Ya’ll OG mold cats are wild. This look awful.

Looking like a chick with thin *** lips.

 

[gokublack]

Yea I’ll take the current shape over those only thing I wouldn’t mind is lighter elephant print

 

[rainking]

I can’t even. If you guys actually had a brand new pair of wearable OGs and saw how sleek and smooth they are, how the colors worked and how they actually looked on your feet worn with virtually anything on or off court …
So let me get this straight. You must prefer the most recent white cement and black cement retros over AMMs. Because AMMs are way closer to OG than anything we’ve had in a long time. Cool, then, I feel you. I can only deduce you also think the jacked up Air Max 90 shape Nike has churned out for years is superior to the recent near-OG shape of the AM3 Infrareds and Laser Blues and other recrafts. You must also hate the new shape of Huarache retros, because it’s the same type of difference. M marztharealist is rolling over in his grave.

 

[rbk93]

AMM shape really isn't any different from any other 3 dropped last year.

 

[jordanhead718212]

OG 3 shape is way better than any retro, agreed. But I also don't care that much. Wear my 2018 black cements with no issue, some of ya really be dragging it

 

[rbk93]

And nobody clowned you?

 

[rafbuddy]

Retro elephant print trash blobs. Retro pleather trash. What yall celebratin. Polyurethane a brick

 

[jordanhead718212]

Lol no, and even if they did, why would I care? Between the new age sneaker cats that proudly wear reps, and the dudes on here that have every sneaker, but can't throw a fit together, why should I?