- 10,559
- 23,207
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
Just contradicted yourself.I'm saying man. It's almost like NT is against the notion that we all have different preferences...
With that said... Reported for the AMM3 comment.
Air Jordan III OG Black Cement returns Feb 2018 - Nike Air on the back
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by palma,
- Start date
- 10,559
- 23,207
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2016
Serious question for all out there. For any model Jordan. OG color with today shapes, or plus color with OG shape? To me, JB likes playing these games regarding this. What would you be more willing to buy?
OG with today's shape.
- 4,726
- 7,336
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- 4,268
- 7,300
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2007
2018 are straight clown shaped 
- 33,860
- 39,723
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 33,860
- 39,723
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 3,874
- 8,050
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
Complaining about the 3s when Reebok been consistently droppin reebok questions in premium uppers and decent collabs. Y’all hold jb to a different standard aka none
dhtowng
Supporter
- 9,844
- 20,467
- Joined
- May 22, 2010
But if it was switched around and the OG shape was the current shape and vice versa yall would switch it up too.
Ill give yall another shocker, AMM3’s right up there with BC3’s as best 3’s ever. Yep, ever. Debatable which one is top dog.
Im 32. Shape aint THAT big of a deal unless its wildly weird looking, yall 45 year olds really draggin it.
Dude stay off the meth.
- 4,855
- 7,400
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2014
To be fair, Reebok has the time to put in the effort because they only make one shoe that people like.
rbk93
Supporter
- 13,968
- 13,142
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2016
Nike's catalog is unmatched.
Reebok has a good amount, even beyond signatures.
Reebok has a good amount, even beyond signatures.
Lmao!!!!To be fair, Reebok has the time to put in the effort because they only make one shoe that people like.
- 4,268
- 7,300
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2007
Nike has more classic shoes than all of the other shoe companies combined.
rainking
Supporter
- 8,231
- 17,883
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2016
Nope. Hadn’t bought a III since 2003 till AMMs, and it’s tied with XI as my favorite model—when it looks like it’s supposed to. The OG is GOAT because of the way it looked overall, not because it was the OG. If it looked like the crap retro version, it wouldn’t be my favorite. It would be on the list of Jordans I don’t like. For example, I wouldn’t buy an VIII if it came brand new out of a time machine from ‘93.And yall still copped.
You keep saying we’re dragging it. News flash: that’s how you effect change. You probably thought complaints about the previous version of the XI was dragging it, too. If not for that, they probably never would’ve fixed it. If you genuinely prefer the retros, great. But that’s irrelevant to the point pretty much everyone else is making.
- 33,860
- 39,723
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
News flash also: it probably not gonna change. Why? Cause most people are fine with the shape.
- 33,860
- 39,723
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 2,342
- 3,154
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2019
Most people just want the shoes and don't care about anything we talk about on here.
That's precisely why we use this forum. To talk about shoes with other people that share a similar passion.
Then you come along and say we shouldn't talk about it.
Good times.
Agreed. It’s actually beneficial to discuss some of the flaws because it could be eventually fixed in the future.
The newer shape is almost a decent mold.
They improved and minimized the EP height, fixed the ankle collar height, and also minimized the padding around the ankle.
Using
Girl Thats Jules
photo as reference…IMO this is one area they need to improve on and make more consistent.
I’ve seen a lot of pairs with the same issue where there’s a slight curve around the mid foot towards the back of the shoe. This might have to do more with the manufacturing process when they are attaching the upper to the midsole/sole which is causing this design flaw.
- 33,860
- 39,723
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- 2,342
- 3,154
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2019
You're free to like whichever rendition of these you prefer. Talk about it all you'd like as well.
Other people have different experiences then you. They'd also like to talk about it. And that's OK.
Right?
- 4,268
- 7,300
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2007
Agreed. It’s actually beneficial to discuss some of the flaws because it could be eventually fixed in the future.
The newer shape is almost a decent mold.
They improved and minimized the EP height, fixed the ankle collar height, and also minimized the padding around the ankle.
Using
IMO this is one area they need to improve on and make more consistent.
I’ve seen a lot of pairs with the same issue where there’s a slight curve around the mid foot towards the back of the shoe. This might have to do more with the manufacturing process when they are attaching the upper to the midsole/sole which is causing this design flaw.
- 33,860
- 39,723
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
I said the mold talk is old, itll never change yadda yadda. I never said dont talk about it ever again. If that were to happen then dear lord what would be the talk in threads like these?
And not everyone wants a 1:1 mold like the OG’s from 1988.
There are some enthusiasts that would prefer that, but Nike would find a way to butcher the shape anyways… see the “85 OG” mold
With that said, the current mold (i.e. Cool Greys, United, Georgetowns) is a decent rendition for the AJ3. There are always opportunity for improvement with each release. By all means highlight, nitpick, complain until we the consumers get what we want.
There are some enthusiasts that would prefer that, but Nike would find a way to butcher the shape anyways… see the “85 OG” mold
With that said, the current mold (i.e. Cool Greys, United, Georgetowns) is a decent rendition for the AJ3. There are always opportunity for improvement with each release. By all means highlight, nitpick, complain until we the consumers get what we want.
See this is where I agree withAgreed. It’s actually beneficial to discuss some of the flaws because it could be eventually fixed in the future.
The newer shape is almost a decent mold.
They improved and minimized the EP height, fixed the ankle collar height, and also minimized the padding around the ankle.
Using
IMO this is one area they need to improve on and make more consistent.
I’ve seen a lot of pairs with the same issue where there’s a slight curve around the mid foot towards the back of the shoe. This might have to do more with the manufacturing process when they are attaching the upper to the midsole/sole which is causing this design flaw.
picasso swerve
like seriously who's paying attention to this? Like even though you pointed it out I still don't see what you're talking about. Y'all are nitpicking. Shoes weren't perfect back then, they aren't perfect now..
