rainking
Supporter
- Aug 12, 2016
- 8,305
- 18,122
That’s fair. But one does wonder why we always see terms like “remastered” or “OG specs” thrown around for mostly Jordan retros vs any other shoe that gets retro’d.
That video up above kind of sums up the whole thought process of most people I guess. Dude goes from “I don’t really need a pair because my 2018s are still pretty fresh”, and within minutes of having the shoe and examining the leather, he says he’s not gonna sleep on em and will be buying a pair. Does he change his mind that quickly if that 2024 pair is exactly like the 2018s?
I think he buys them because he realizes they’re better. But he’s also a sneaker geek like all of us, I assume. He’s not representative of that 90+ percent of the market. People buy the shoes again because MOST people don’t have a fresh pair after 5+ years. Which is why I said this whole strategy or belief—if it’s real—on Nike’s side that every version of the same shoe has to be slightly different to entice people to buy it is nothing but marketing and product planning people justifying their salaries.
Let me put it this way. As I said the other day, Nike and Jordan Brand created this disaster. Now they’ve spent however many of the past years trying to dig themselves out of it. But had they only ever released exact copies of the OGS this whole time, no one is ever going to convince me they wouldn’t have sold just as many pairs every freaking time. The company created its own self-fulfilling prophecy, and seems incapable of realizing it was a stupid bit of logic in the first place.
Last edited: