Originally Posted by
likethematrix
Originally Posted by
r33p04s
Originally Posted by
likethematrix
Originally Posted by Kingtre
im a former mercedes owner so im in the know.
but what im saying is, this C coupe isnt that much smaller than the E coupe and the E isnt that much smaller than a CL.
thats too many coupes.
they shoulda deaded the E coupe and made the C the flagship mid-range coupe.
and the SLK is the roadster. more for speed.
im not 100%, but i think the SLK 55 was their fastest car on the low. cause it had the same engine as the SL in a car 500lb lighter.
also the CLK was not the "E coupe" due to it being made off the C class chassis. it was basically a C with 2 door.
going from E-coupe to CL more about price and engine than size...
the SLK is a more compact sportier SL....SLK55 had the n/a motor SL55 had the kompressor motor...no contest SL55>SLK55
the CLK came directly from the the E-coupe (W124) just a name change...
dude just quit. i ignored you the first time.
i test drove the new E class coupe 2 years before it dropped and the same with every new mercedes model.
everything you are saying is copied and pasted and makes no sense.
i know these cars bro.
slk a sportier SL? they are 2 totally different cars.
im not bout to get into a conversation cause you have no idea what the hell you are talking about and obviously have no idea what i WAS talkin bout with Tre.
im the first person in N. America who does not work for MBZ to drive this car.
got it up to 85 on Century blvd.
had a plastic bottle shaped like a torso full of sand and water in the passenger seat.
sooooooo..... i know quite a bit.
this pic is from dec 27th 2008.
i shoulda sold these pics