paulprince3730
Banned
- 4,948
- 1,056
- Joined
- May 23, 2013
^lmao
Youre so wrong tho
Youre so wrong tho
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I have no problem w/ the reasoning, but the strong move quiet.
Forreal I could def. see Nike retoing all of the Yeezy 1's & 2's, re-name the shoe and just do a mass general release....milk all that money they can get and not be bound by contract to Kanye?...
And at the same time be a huge slap in the face to Kanye...new colorways, etc...I wouldn't be calling out Mark Parker like that...
Forreal I could def. see Nike retoing all of the Yeezy 1's & 2's, re-name the shoe and just do a mass general release....milk all that money they can get and not be bound by contract to Kanye?...
And at the same time be a huge slap in the face to Kanye...new colorways, etc...I wouldn't be calling out Mark Parker like that...
Would that even be legal? If so, they should cuz it'll be hilarious.
Nike should never have given Kanye a shoe.
I really respect Nike's policy of only endorsing pro athletes, it reflects Nike's seriousness, commitment and credibility on being a true sports brand.
It's a shame that the yeezys ever happened.
adidas is a better match for Kanye and his style.
Also, if this means that Kanye won't wear anymore Nikes / Jordans in the future, even better.
Fan boys / hypebeasts / general idiots will all be wearing sneakers that aren't Nike.