2019 All Star Black Infrared Air Jordan 6

[Aquamanjay_]

Those last fake pics you posted do look like nubuck tho.

Sigh... At least back in the marqueesole days, they looked mostly accurate. I wish “early” rep UA Thing didn’t exist, and that Jordan Brand previewed their stuff three months early. The middleman’s stuff always is inconsistent. The BC3 showed men’s retail pairs before UA pairs.

 

[airthompson]

For those in the LA area, the Jordan store has a Finals worn Infrared 6 from ‘91. Poetic seeing that he won the title just a few miles away at the Forum.

 

[Aquamanjay_]

For those in the LA area, the Jordan store has a Finals worn Infrared 6 from ‘91. Poetic seeing that he won the title just a few miles away at the Forum.

Was that pair repainted? The red looks dark

 

[dmoney23444]

Why do these pics all have the jumpman on the toggles?

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Why do these pics all have the jumpman on the toggles?

Lol. The lace lock is supposed to. Nike is on the flip side.

 

[dmoney23444]

Lol. The lace lock is supposed to. Nike is on the flip side.

Yea I’m tripping. Just didn’t notice Nike air on any of them in the pics.

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Just like the 5

 

[engineer]

For those in the LA area, the Jordan store has a Finals worn Infrared 6 from ‘91. Poetic seeing that he won the title just a few miles away at the Forum.

Someone needs to take a picture with flash so we can end the debate of whether or not MJs pairs had 3M.

 

[tonytobacco]

Just like the 5

what is this sorcery

 

[Aquamanjay_]

what is this sorcery

Stop motion. Took 13 pics, then made a gif

 

[jayz4days]

the 2000 retro was on point. the infrared sample too. As long as the quality can come close to that, these should be fine.

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Retail pair materials should look like this. This is Durabuck that has no excess sheen or contrast. The toe box on these is bootish, but it’s from 2012, so...

 

[headdetective]

 

[spoonmanofthehour]

For those in the LA area, the Jordan store has a Finals worn Infrared 6 from ‘91. Poetic seeing that he won the title just a few miles away at the Forum.

I want a retro like this one, Jordan Brand. You jerkoffs. Stop jacking up grails.

 

[KanyIZZY]

Retail pair materials should look like this. This is Durabuck that has no excess sheen or contrast. The toe box on these is bootish, but it’s from 2012, so...

I sure as hell hope not.

 

[Aquamanjay_]

I sure as hell hope not.

What do you mean? I’m talking about the material, not the midsole or the shape.

 

[skylondiggs]

Lol if they came out like that, cancel the whole release

 

[KanyIZZY]

What do you mean? I’m talking about the material, not the midsole or the shape.

I know it's durabuck but it looks suss lol. The last pics look okay but honestly I prefer to stay away from anything after DMP's and CDP Carmines If I get anything like that pic I'll be annoyed.

Edit: I did realize that the difference between the top 2 and bottom 2 pics helped me realize something that I didn't like about the 2014's midsole/shape. Its bulkier than they should be and the ones on the bottom have the slimmer look that they should have like the 2000's. BM V's from 2016 had a bulkier look to them too.

 

[dhtowng]

For those in the LA area, the Jordan store has a Finals worn Infrared 6 from ‘91. Poetic seeing that he won the title just a few miles away at the Forum.

Y’all talk a lot about yalls disdain for the “boot shape” but it appears even the OG had a boot like shape as well. I think it’s just the nature of the design. Not that I like the boot shape, just saying.

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Y’all talk a lot about yalls disdain for the “boot shape” but it appears even the OG had a boot like shape as well. I think it’s just the nature of the design. Not that I like the boot shape, just saying.

I was going to say this before, because I’ve seen dozens of 91 pairs with boot shapes, but I didn’t want to get **** for pointing that out. What people really want is the 2010 shape

 

[Aquamanjay_]

Lol if they came out like that, cancel the whole release

I’m not talking about the colorway, I’m talking about the Durabuck wth? We know we’re not getting the 1991 Durabuck or the 2000, and that sample is the Durabuck folks have been saying they want.

 

[KanyIZZY]

Y’all talk a lot about yalls disdain for the “boot shape” but it appears even the OG had a boot like shape as well. I think it’s just the nature of the design. Not that I like the boot shape, just saying.

Could be like OG XI's.. where there are a few pics floating around of MJ wearing Concords with somewhat lower PL height. Because I feel like not all OG VI pics are booted up. Personally, they can keep any boot looking OG.. I don't want I don't like and I don't ever want to see that shape again.

 

[KanyIZZY]

I was going to say this before, because I’ve seen dozens of 91 pairs with boot shapes, but I didn’t want to get **** for pointing that out. What people really want is the 2000 shape

Fixed.

 

[skylondiggs]

I’m not talking about the colorway, I’m talking about the Durabuck wth?

I know that. I was simply speaking on the colorway.

 

[Aquamanjay_]

I know that. I was simply speaking on the colorway.

Oh......