- 3,711
- 1,464
I think someone mentioned the IS is better... It does look better design wise on the exterior but the 'new' interior looks outdated
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not even sure why the C is being compared to the E.
Both have their own pros and cons and the two serve different purposes. There's a reason the two are in different categories, one is compact and the other is mid-size.
the best deals will probably be towards the end of the calendar year during their december to remember sales event
They would but if they can take more money from you they would. I don't think they'll be desperate enough to move their vehicles until later though especially if they haven't gotten their 2015s in the dealership yet. At the end it's all about how you negotiate anyways. Even when there are "deals" on leases, I am always able to negotiate it at a much better price. MB isn't Porsche where they aren't willing to budge just to make a sale, MB, BMW, Audi, Lexus, etc... all these guys wants to be the best selling brands so they want to move the vehicles as much as possible.
Definitely helps if you know the guy but you also got to trust him. Sometimes it's the ones you know that'll screw you because they think you'd just trust whatever they say. Not saying all are bad but definitely know your price points so you know he isn't just throwing BS numbers.
You can easily compare a C to an E though. If youre spending x amount on a loaded C, why not just get the E? Bigger car, etc etc. That could be one person's mentality. Theres no reason a C should be compared to just an IS/3/A4 etc.Obviously you cant compare an C to a 370z or a Grand Cherokee.Not even sure why the C is being compared to the E.
Both have their own pros and cons and the two serve different purposes. There's a reason the two are in different categories, one is compact and the other is mid-size.
Not even sure why the C is being compared to the E.
Both have their own pros and cons and the two serve different purposes. There's a reason the two are in different categories, one is compact and the other is mid-size.
You can easily compare a C to an E though. If youre spending x amount on a loaded C, why not just get the E? Bigger car, etc etc. That could be one person's mentality. Theres no reason a C should be compared to just an IS/3/A4 etc.Obviously you cant compare an C to a 370z or a Grand Cherokee.
But if pricepoint is the only basis then you just blur the lines between categories and all other sedans.
Nah bruh.all that has to be said
ok so now youre admitting to not making sense Picasso
trollin right along
No, that was just dumb.makes about as much sense as comparing an astro van to a 918 spyder. let's move on
I guess I see things different. C class to E is acceptable, but a C to an S? Thats just...no.I mean yeah people will think about it, same way people think "should I get a car or an SUV?" or "do I need a coupe or a sedan?".
Still doesn't mean you can compare the two. I get what you are saying but it's still shouldn't be compared as if it is the same car. It's just the price and going up. I mean if you really think about it, you can keep thinking that way until you get to the S-Class.
I optioned my CLA, a few more grand and it's a C-Class. I get the C-Class, I wish I got more options for a few more grand. If I got the optioned C, a few more grand and you can get a base E350, option it for a few more grand because I need that navi. Then a few more grand and I can get the E550. Then option that out for a few more grand because again I need that navi. Then a few more grand and I can get the CLS550, and so on and so forth. All of those are like about ~$10k apart from of each other, from CLA to C to E350 to E550 to CLS and it narrows the gap further if you add options and compare it to the next car up the line in a base model.