- 44,741
- 66,451
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2001
I feel like the contract situation hurts both Clarkson and the Lakers. I've *****ed enough times about it in the Lakers thread.
Edit:
FYI: Teams can only sign second round picks to three or four year contracts if they are under the cap. The Lakers could have done this, but they used the cap space instead to claim Boozer last summer. Hence, why Clarkson got a two year contract.
Thankfully the Lakers seem to have learned from their mistake last summer because they signed Anthony Brown to a three year contract over the summer.
You keep saying this hurts the lakers and I still don't see it. This is the best position they could be in. Saying boozer's contract caused this is flat out wrong, stop saying that . Also you keep ignoring the fact that Clarkson would've had to agree to a 3 or 4 year deal which would have been a Longshot and out of the lakers hands anyway
Last edited: