2014 NBA Draft Thread

The past like 3 pages have been almost indecipherable.

Anthony Davis (game changing college defender) struggles on D should give you pause in projecting Jabari to be anything other than terrible but not on #NT, he will be fine.
 
even guys like michael kidd ghilcrist struggle alot . when you exert alot of energy into offense , aka jabari parkers bread and butter . your defense is going to struggle . or vice versa. jabari got that james harden build and game ...and look how gassed he be at the end games...especially the portland series
 
The past like 3 pages have been almost indecipherable.

Anthony Davis (game changing college defender) struggles on D should give you pause in projecting Jabari to be anything other than terrible but not on #NT, he will be fine.
The bottom line is there are a lot of subpar wing defenders who still make a big difference offensively. Harden, Gay, Kevin Martin, Melo to an extent even... The poor defense is getting overstated.
 
even guys like michael kidd ghilcrist struggle alot . when you exert alot of energy into offense , aka jabari parkers bread and butter . your defense is going to struggle . or vice versa. jabari got that james harden build and game ...and look how gassed he be at the end games...especially the portland series

It's takes a very special player to give you great play on both ends.
 
The bottom line is there are a lot of subpar wing defenders who still make a big difference offensively. Harden, Gay, Kevin Martin, Melo to an extent even... The poor defense is getting overstated.

yeah and what did I say?

His ceiling depends on his ability to stick at 3.

There is a difference between a huge wing, who has a physical advantage over 90% of NBA SF's, vs an average sized 4.


What I'm saying isn't controversial.



Look Mike Beasley couldn't stay at wing and he was just as productive, just as dominant (maybe more), exact same size with a very similar game to Jabari Parker when he was at K state, how did his career turn out?
 
Last edited:
yeah and what did I say?

His ceiling depends on his ability to stick at 3.

There is a difference between a huge wing, who has a physical advantage over 90% of NBA SF's, vs an average sized 4.


What I'm saying isn't controversial.



Look Mike Beasley couldn't stay at wing and he was just as productive, just as dominant (maybe more), exact same size with a very similar game to Jabari Parker when he was at K state, how did his career turn out?
I'm just saying he has the skills to play the 3 and there are plenty of subpar wing defenders. Parker won't be any different.

Beasley? Why are you bringing him up? His skill set didn't hold a candle to Parker's. I don't care how his career turned out
laugh.gif
Clear reach there
 
Last edited:
I'm just saying he has the skills to play the 3 and there are plenty of subpar wing defenders. Parker won't be any different.

Beasley? Why are you bringing him up? His skill set hails in comparison to Parker's. I don't care how his career turned out :lol Clear reach there

A reach?

Pails in comparison?

I see cats have already forgotten what Mike was at K state. :{


He put up 39 and 14 vs Kansas, how you think that happened? Mike had it all when came to scoring the ball and Jabari is smarter than Mike so he won't be out of league in 5 years but the point remains, Mike hasn't been a useful NBA player and a big part of that is his defense.
 
I think I trust most players coming out of Chicago. There's no doubt in my mind Jabari will be a real good player, I just dont think he'll be the best player in this draft.
 
A reach?

Pails in comparison?

I see cats have already forgotten what Mike was at K state.
mean.gif



He put up 39 and 14 vs Kansas, how you think that happened? Mike had it all when came to scoring the ball and Jabari is smarter than Mike so he won't be out of league in 5 years but the point remains, Mike hasn't been a useful NBA player and a big part of that is his defense.
Nobody forgot. Beasley did not have the polish Parker has now. What happened to Beasley has nothing to do with Parker's career, bottom line.
 
Last edited:
Nobody forgot. Beasley did not have the polish Parker has now. What happened to Beasley has nothing to do with Parker's career, bottom line.

You are just dead wrong.

He is the exact same type of player, a 3/4, isolation, mid post scorer. Same height, same weight, same standing reach, used in the exact same way in college, both dominated the boards. terrific ball handlers, solid shooters.

How are they different?

Undersized 4's don't put up 38.9 PER in college without polish, you are mis remembering man. :lol
 
Last edited:
You are just dead wrong.

He is the exact same type of player, a 3/4, isolation, mid post scorer. Same height, same weight, same standing reach, used in the exact same way in college, both dominated the boards. terrific ball handlers, solid shooters.

How are they different?

Undersized 4's don't put up 38.9 PER in college without polish, you are mis remembering man.
laugh.gif
Parker played a 4 at Duke but he is fully capable of putting the ball on the deck like a guard. The way he will play in the pros will be in a creating, off the dribble role. He is capable of creating for himself and others. Beasley didn't have the same ability and that's why, among other things (dedication, focus, defense) he never panned out in the league. I would not consider Beasley a terrific ball handler at all. He doesn't create shots for himself nor others, he isn't built that way. He's more of a catch and dribble twice for a jumper, or catch in the paint, or catch and face up take two dribbles type.
 
Last edited:
How is Mike Brown garbage?? Those Cavs teams he coached with LeBron where great given with what players he had to work with outside. Plus he was the one who refined LeBron's defensive game. Also with the Lakers, everyone knows he never got a fair share. Almost anyone can admit, even Phil Jackson would have struggled winning with such an injury riddled team. Lastly, the only reason Dan Gilbert re-hired Brown this past season was an attempt to lure LeBron this offseason. However, with such a poor season, Gilbert realized that LeBron returning was a pipe dream, and getting a rookie coach for a massive rebuilding process is needed. 
 
:lol beasley was the ultimate ball stopper, it was embarrasing to watch at times

How is Mike Brown garbage?? Those Cavs teams he coached with LeBron where great given with what players he had to work with outside. Plus he was the one who refined LeBron's defensive game. Also with the Lakers, everyone knows he never got a fair share. Almost anyone can admit, even Phil Jackson would have struggled winning with such an injury riddled team. Lastly, the only reason Dan Gilbert re-hired Brown this past season was an attempt to lure LeBron this offseason. However, with such a poor season, Gilbert realized that LeBron returning was a pipe dream, and getting a rookie coach for a massive rebuilding process is needed. 

just like scott brooks, his best player hid his weaknesses as a coach & that cleveland offense was terrible during the bron era
 
Back
Top Bottom