- Jul 6, 2008
- 4,163
- 3,973
2013 College Football Thread (Realer than Real Deal Holyfield -->S/O Craftsy)
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by gunna get it,
- Start date
mr marcus
Banned
- May 3, 2010
- 26,572
- 5,415
Damn 05 seems so long ago
- Oct 4, 2011
- 3,848
- 1,903
Reggie Bush Vs Fresno St 
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- Jan 25, 2008
- 25,730
- 2,900
Cal is the youngest team in the country with the toughest schedule!
I wouldn't be surprised if Mixon came to Cal and started right away
I wouldn't be surprised if Mixon came to Cal and started right away
- Jul 20, 2004
- 4,266
- 400
I'm not sure how much of a difference a true frosh will make. Bryant makes the most sense. If Kuglar hadn't messed his shoulder maybe he'd be ready to play. Either way, a change is needed.
- Jan 7, 2004
- 28,043
- 10,466
Has to be Badgers, OU, or Cal for Mixon.
jumpmanfromdabay
Banned
- Jan 25, 2008
- 25,730
- 2,900
Hope he wants to stay local for his family to watch him play 
Last edited:
- Jan 7, 2004
- 28,043
- 10,466
RB class too sick. Headlined by Mixon, Fournette, Michel, Yearby, Hurd.
- Jan 7, 2004
- 28,043
- 10,466
Racean Thomas, Hood, Cook.
- Oct 22, 2004
- 5,409
- 923
Does anyone else harden when they see Charlie Weis?
Edit: Oops, I forgot to write arteries.
Last edited:
- Jun 17, 2006
- 7,309
- 1,984
My pants definitely start fitting a little tighter, yes.
3
39478
Guest
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,233
- 53,417
noooooooooooo 
- Sep 24, 2002
- 7,349
- 243
- Apr 24, 2005
- 43,678
- 8,689
Dude what the hell 
:x
:x
- Jan 7, 2004
- 28,043
- 10,466
I Metapod when I see Jenn Sterger.
- Oct 31, 2009
- 28,769
- 11,971
But in all seriousness, I miss those USC teams.
- Nov 17, 2004
- 37,287
- 19,666
- Jul 26, 2006
- 1,873
- 85
damn SOS, you must mess yourself when you see Mangino 
- Dec 30, 2008
- 7,137
- 481
- Jan 10, 2010
- 2,721
- 266
we had this game won
this game and the 2005 College Basketball National Championship game VS UNC are the two games I got emotional about EDIT: the 2001 elite eight game VS arizona too
Last edited:
- Oct 22, 2004
- 5,409
- 923
damn SOS, you must mess yourself when you see Mangino
I said arteries! But yeah, Mangino gives me a funny feeling in my pantaloons too.
- Dec 3, 2007
- 3,862
- 279
IronMan: article on SI today about which job is better USC or UT. Funny cause we just spoke about it. Good points are brought up. I didn't ask the question.
Hey Stewart, in your opinion, what is the better head-coaching job, USC or Texas? And why?
-- Mike S., New York
Well, let's look at the pros and cons of each.
Both programs are in extremely desirable recruiting territories, but Texas is the flagship university in an enormous state dripping with talent, whereas USC's stronghold is primarily in one region of its state. On the other hand, the USC brand is stronger nationally, both because of its recent tradition (we're only five years removed from USC essentially being what Alabama is now) and its Hollywood image. Kids in Texas grow up wanting to play for Texas, but kids from New Jersey want to go play at Snoop Dogg's favorite school.
Money is not an issue at either place, though Texas has more of it. Facilities may have been a concern at USC in the past, but they're certainly not anymore. The John McKay Center, which opened last year, has all the bells and whistles one could ask for. Conversely, USC pays its head coaches plenty, but it's not likely to give out $5 million a year, like Texas has to Mack Brown, or hire Greg Robinson as a quality control guy. Advantage, oil money.
Meanwhile, Texas draws 100,000 fans every week to its constantly refurbished on-campus stadium. USC often plays in front of 10,000 to 20,000 empty seats at the dilapidated Coliseum (though it certainly rocks when the Trojans are winning). Austin is a college town. LA is not. Advantage, 'Horns.
Finally, if a coach is looking for the best path to conference and national championships ... it's at Texas. Pete Carroll might disagree. In fact, I might not have held this opinion five years ago. But assuming a coach has the necessary band of four- and five-star recruits, which would he prefer -- facing and recruiting against Oregon, Stanford, UCLA and Washington or Oklahoma and ... ? If a coach has things rolling at Texas, his only worthy adversary in a given year should be the Sooners. If he has things rolling at USC, he still has to face the Stanford defense and the Oregon offense.
Both schools offer top-five jobs (along with Ohio State, Florida and Alabama) and they should both have no trouble attracting a plethora of A-list candidates. But the answer to this question is Texas.
Hey Stewart, in your opinion, what is the better head-coaching job, USC or Texas? And why?
-- Mike S., New York
Well, let's look at the pros and cons of each.
Both programs are in extremely desirable recruiting territories, but Texas is the flagship university in an enormous state dripping with talent, whereas USC's stronghold is primarily in one region of its state. On the other hand, the USC brand is stronger nationally, both because of its recent tradition (we're only five years removed from USC essentially being what Alabama is now) and its Hollywood image. Kids in Texas grow up wanting to play for Texas, but kids from New Jersey want to go play at Snoop Dogg's favorite school.
Money is not an issue at either place, though Texas has more of it. Facilities may have been a concern at USC in the past, but they're certainly not anymore. The John McKay Center, which opened last year, has all the bells and whistles one could ask for. Conversely, USC pays its head coaches plenty, but it's not likely to give out $5 million a year, like Texas has to Mack Brown, or hire Greg Robinson as a quality control guy. Advantage, oil money.
Meanwhile, Texas draws 100,000 fans every week to its constantly refurbished on-campus stadium. USC often plays in front of 10,000 to 20,000 empty seats at the dilapidated Coliseum (though it certainly rocks when the Trojans are winning). Austin is a college town. LA is not. Advantage, 'Horns.
Finally, if a coach is looking for the best path to conference and national championships ... it's at Texas. Pete Carroll might disagree. In fact, I might not have held this opinion five years ago. But assuming a coach has the necessary band of four- and five-star recruits, which would he prefer -- facing and recruiting against Oregon, Stanford, UCLA and Washington or Oklahoma and ... ? If a coach has things rolling at Texas, his only worthy adversary in a given year should be the Sooners. If he has things rolling at USC, he still has to face the Stanford defense and the Oregon offense.
Both schools offer top-five jobs (along with Ohio State, Florida and Alabama) and they should both have no trouble attracting a plethora of A-list candidates. But the answer to this question is Texas.
- Dec 3, 2007
- 3,862
- 279
we had this game won
Was rooting hard for Dee Brown, Luther Head, and Deron Williams that year.
- Feb 9, 2009
- 9,622
- 783
In consecutive years during those Pete Carroll day they went on the road.....
Smashed Auburn in Jordan Hare
Smashed Va Tech in DC
Smashed Arkansas in Fayetteville
Besides Tennessee you probably won't find another team outside of a mid major to travel like that today. They were definitely fun to watch.
Smashed Auburn in Jordan Hare
Smashed Va Tech in DC
Smashed Arkansas in Fayetteville
Besides Tennessee you probably won't find another team outside of a mid major to travel like that today. They were definitely fun to watch.
