- Jan 7, 2004
- 28,043
- 10,466
Pat Fitz, name not mentioned enough.
USC would be lucky to uproot him from his NW loyalty.
USC would be lucky to uproot him from his NW loyalty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Coming up with a top 5 is hard, even a top 10 is difficult. That's why throwing out a "single best" or "top program" in the country is kind of laughable. It's a very bold statement that is tough to back up, since everyone has different criterias.
Texas has the deepest pockets of any school, except maybe Oregon (that oil money is yikes.) Texas has the best in-state recruiting of any school except USC (because the florida schools split the state into three). Texas has good academics for a ginormous public school, and history. It's own tv network, a relatively easy path through its conference, and if the coach can recruit the southeast and midwest (hell nationally) then what's to stop it from becoming an instant powerhouse.This is arguable, saying Texas is a top ten or even top five is not arguable. "Single best", holy hyperbole. I understand the resources and booster support and the in state recruiting, however others can boost other factors that Texas lags in.Texas is the single best job in college football. Especially if you can recruit nationally and can command the respect of the boosters, ahem, Nick Saban...
Schools like UCLA, Oregon, etc. thrive when the traditional powerhouses have down periods. That's not even a shot at those schools. OU historically snatches up the good Texas kids that can't make it into one of the Texas schools for whatever reason, primarily academics. UCLA's a basketball school. It runs LA currently because of the sanctions. Oregon was never recruiting Texas and Cali as well as it is currently (partly because the longhorns suck and the trojans do too/can't woo or sign those kids due to restrictions.)The different criterias is what makes it hard to distinguish these jobs. Booster support? Fan support? Facilities? Recent success? Historical success? Program wins? National championships? National following?Coming up with a top 5 is hard, even a top 10 is difficult. That's why throwing out a "single best" or "top program" in the country is kind of laughable. It's a very bold statement that is tough to back up, since everyone has different criterias.
Ironman is right in that there are too many things to really peg down the best program. Based on today's current state of things, these are the jobs I would consider to be the top 10 (in no particular order):
Ohio State
Oregon
USC
Texas
LSU
Michigan
Alabama
Florida
Georgia
Notre Dame
But even then, I'm leaving out programs like Oklahoma, UCLA, TAMU, Penn State, Nebraska, Auburn, and Florida State.
Pat Fitz, name not mentioned enough.
USC would be lucky to uproot him from his NW loyalty.
Florida and Ohio st. are interchangeable to me
They buried a DGD today and seems like all his former teammates came to show their respect
Paul: Mixon to Wisconsin behind the big eaters.
A DAMN GOOD DAWGwhat is a DGD if you don't mind me asking?They buried a DGD today and seems like all his former teammates came to show their respect
anyone think NW can upset OSU?
anyone think NW can upset OSU?
Sounding like Michigan will make some changes on the O-line. Glasgow to OC, Bryant to OG. Bryant or Bosch but I'd hate to see Bosch's RS burned.
Honestly though, at best it'll be 60/40 NW to OSU fans; probably closer to 50/50. I was worried more about this game than Wisconsin coming into big10 play.Home field for NW. Coach Fitz is the wildcard.