First, I would start Jennings. RBs in the flex typically do better than WRs. He is starting and will get touches.
Yes thats a great deal for you, unless you are hurting at WR. Alex Green might lose his job to Starks, Daniel Thomas is hit or miss, and Roberts is a decent WR but for a back who gets 15-20 carries a game its a steal. Hawkins might not do very much but its Willis your after.
That looks solid. I would do it.
Although you could use a RB, you are right about it depleting your WRs. Colston has been playing great, and Titus is benefitting from Burleson being out. Anyway you could counter offer Bess and keep Titus at least?i was offered doug martin, josh freeman, and torrey smith for
marques colston
titus young
and stephen jackson
i know doug martin is a stud, but trading away all of those guys would deplete my WR's.
i would only have fitz, stephen johnson, torrey smith, davon bess
my other RB is matt forte
would you guys do this trade? im currently 6 out of 12 in my ppr league (top 6 make playoffs).
starting lineups are:
QB
WR
WR
WR
RB
RB
TE
WR/TE FLEX
KICKER
DEF
Is your league PPR? If it's PPR, I'd start V.Jax. Also, I tend to hate starting players on Thursday night games because of the short amount of time for rest. The only exceptions where I had success on a player going into a Thursday night game was Andre Brown vs the Panthers.
Again, is your league PPR? If so, I would definitely take the trade, but RG3 is becoming risky every week, compared to Drew Brees. The only upside I see between RG3 and Brees is RG3's rushing yards and rushing TDs (2 points more than a passing TD). Witten is really enticing in a PPR league.
For your RB situation, it highly depends on your league format, if it's PPR. The reason is, I would definitely start J.Bell, Ronnie Brown, or Marcel Reese, as they are RB/FB's (Reese) that can catch the ball. Stephen Jackson would not be on my list of RBs to start as he is facing against the Niners D, as well as splitting carries with Daryl Richardson.
Check my response.
my bad didn't see it.
Haha I hope RG3 is going to bounce back (got him in one of my leagues), but it seems like teams are figuring out how to defend Washington's offense, plus the FACT that Washington's WRs SUCK doesn't help RG3 at all. Again, the only thing appealing to me between RG3 and Brees is RG3 can get you points off rushing yards and rushing touchdowns.
Damn, why you do me like that with those options?
Pick 2 (running back)
Isaac Redman, Daniel Thomas, Felix Jones, Vick Ballard
Pick 1 (flex)
Michael Crabtree, Danny Amendola, Ryan Broyles, Golden Tate, Redman, Thomas, Jones, Ballard
Bad idea, in my opinion. I wouldn't buy high on Redman after that one game. Dwyer and Mendenhall are coming back and it'll be a time-share among those three RBs. Even Big Ben stated that they are the "Three-Headed Monster", with no clear-cut starters going forward.
Pick 2 (running back)
Isaac Redman, Daniel Thomas, Felix Jones, Vick Ballard
Pick 1 (flex)
Michael Crabtree, Danny Amendola, Ryan Broyles, Golden Tate, Redman, Thomas, Jones, Ballard
This was the message where I replied and it stated I need approval of a moderator before it gets posted...
Definitely, I mean, if that is the team you have above, you have absolutely nothing to change for position players, except maybe your defense. For sure, your weakest position is TE, and that doesn't mean much when the other positions are rock solid (except I would not start Andre Hawkins every week on my Flex).
