- 6,874
- 2,805
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2002
I do
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
What do I care if he's a Packer fan or a Vikings fan? He could be a Bengals fan as far as I'm concerned. Dude pointed out a preseason gameagainst a weak defense like it actually means something.Originally Posted by Jehlers02
You assuming dude is a Packer fan when hes a Viking fan has nothing to do with Pre-season games.Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Yeah, I always get salty when I'm talking preseason football. Nice work there.Originally Posted by Jehlers02
I like how you think your arguing with a packer fanOriginally Posted by koolbarbone
Nice sarcasm detector.Originally Posted by wismonty21
Maybe you should watch the game instead of commenting on it with zero knowledge of what actually happened.Originally Posted by koolbarbone
That's because it was the third string playing.Originally Posted by wismonty21
^ Did you watch the Packers/Cardinals preseason game from a few days ago though? They looked for real man.....honestly. Like a whole different squad than last year.
Rodgers absolutely TOYED with the Cardinals FIRST-string defense. Go back....watch that game, tell me what you think. Rodgers literally targeted DRC and went right at him and guess who came out on top every time....Rodgers. Yes, I realize that it's just the preseason, but is it not FIRST-string offense .vs. FIRST-string defense for most of the first half? And guess what...the score at the end of the first half: Packers 38, Cardinals 10.
You can put all the weight you want in the preseason but those performances don't amount to much. Even if they did, I wouldn't feel all that great considering it was the Cardinals defense. But go ahead and get pumped off that win, I would too after a 6-win season.
Dudes a viking fan.
Your salty as hell
Your even saltier
THE GR8 wrote:
Best QB/RB combo in the L,Originally Posted by minnetrapolis
I don't understand how people are saying the bears will win the division? They have a skilled sissy for a QB and no receivers, plus a defense full of geezers. Can someone explain this to me?!WRs who are underated cause they have never played with a legit QB, a solid Oline, a very talented TE duo helps the recieving game as well as Forte, a defense which is underated and when all healthy is not much worse than they were the superbowl season. We are finally fixing our issues at safety, we got alot of up and coming dudes in the secondary, while the LB combo of Briggs/Urlacher is second to none and we have a GREAT front 4.
Not to mention one of the best ST unit in the league with Hester, Gould, and Maynard... speaking of which since yall Pack fans seem to be getting all hyped over preseason () did any of yall witness Hesters punt return last night...
heeeees backkkk... the acceleration is just
> Your teams "combo"
EHHHH YOU FAILED HORRIBLY AT SOME OF THOSE COMBOS YOU POSTED...SORRY GUY.
Originally Posted by jose cansec0
THE GR8 wrote:
Best QB/RB combo in the L,Originally Posted by minnetrapolis
I don't understand how people are saying the bears will win the division? They have a skilled sissy for a QB and no receivers, plus a defense full of geezers. Can someone explain this to me?!WRs who are underated cause they have never played with a legit QB, a solid Oline, a very talented TE duo helps the recieving game as well as Forte, a defense which is underated and when all healthy is not much worse than they were the superbowl season. We are finally fixing our issues at safety, we got alot of up and coming dudes in the secondary, while the LB combo of Briggs/Urlacher is second to none and we have a GREAT front 4.
Not to mention one of the best ST unit in the league with Hester, Gould, and Maynard... speaking of which since yall Pack fans seem to be getting all hyped over preseason () did any of yall witness Hesters punt return last night...
heeeees backkkk... the acceleration is just
How can you proclaim to have the best QB/RB in the league when they haven't even played a REAL game with each other yet.
as much as i +#+#$@% hate their guts, people were claiming that the Celtics had one of the best Big 3s the NBA has seen in a while right afterthey got Ray and KG, before they played together... and what happened? They won a championship
Agreed.at dude reaching and thin king he won the argument.
Anyways, I did. This isn't the NBA, you can't claim to be the "Best" without even touching the field. So dudes statementwas dumb just like anyone else who tries to back it up.
O yeah?Originally Posted by THE GR8
as much as i respect LT he is getting very old and his production has declined immensely
Anyways, I did. This isn't the NBA, you can't claim to be the "Best" without even touching the field. So dudes statement was dumb just like anyone else who tries to back it up.Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
Agreed.at dude reaching and thin king he won the argument.
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
Originally Posted by THE GR8
Best QB/RB combo in the L,Originally Posted by minnetrapolis
I don't understand how people are saying the bears will win the division? They have a skilled sissy for a QB and no receivers, plus a defense full of geezers. Can someone explain this to me?!WRs who are underated cause they have never played with a legit QB, a solid Oline, a very talented TE duo helps the recieving game as well as Forte, a defense which is underated and when all healthy is not much worse than they were the superbowl season. We are finally fixing our issues at safety, we got alot of up and coming dudes in the secondary, while the LB combo of Briggs/Urlacher is second to none and we have a GREAT front 4.
Not to mention one of the best ST unit in the league with Hester, Gould, and Maynard... speaking of which since yall Pack fans seem to be getting all hyped over preseason () did any of yall witness Hesters punt return last night...
heeeees backkkk... the acceleration is just
> Your teams "combo"
You basically proved my point there. LT took a big production hit last season and at his age and with the emergence of Rivers it isnt gonna getany better. He wasnt beeter than Forte last season and Forte was a @+%#*#! rookie last season. Basically Forte is only going up while much love to LT hes afirst ballot HOFer IMO but hes only going further down. But even last season Forte was better, i expect a bigger difference this season.Originally Posted by JPZx
O yeah?Originally Posted by THE GR8
as much as i respect LT he is getting very old and his production has declined immensely
2008 LT - 12 TDs, 1,100 YDs
2008 Forte - 12 TDs, 1200 YDs
Very old and his production has declined immensely? His worst season in a Chargers uniform is just about the same as Forte's rookie season which is being used by you and other Bears fans to show us how Forte is one of the best backs in the league (calling him a part of the best QB/RB combo, etc.)
LT will be back this year. 1300+ yards and 12+ TDsOriginally Posted by THE GR8
You basically proved my point there. LT took a big production hit last season and at his age and with the emergence of Rivers it isnt gonna get any better. He wasnt beeter than Forte last season and Forte was a !@!%%@@ rookie last season. Basically Forte is only going up while much love to LT hes a first ballot HOFer IMO but hes only going further down. But even last season Forte was better, i expect a bigger difference this season.Originally Posted by JPZx
O yeah?Originally Posted by THE GR8
as much as i respect LT he is getting very old and his production has declined immensely
2008 LT - 12 TDs, 1,100 YDs
2008 Forte - 12 TDs, 1200 YDs
Very old and his production has declined immensely? His worst season in a Chargers uniform is just about the same as Forte's rookie season which is being used by you and other Bears fans to show us how Forte is one of the best backs in the league (calling him a part of the best QB/RB combo, etc.)
how when we was 9-7 with orton bum %%$Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
I do
fraij da 5 11 wrote:
Boston Big 3 = 60% of their whole starting line up... its a lot different.
and how much of the offense will run throw cutler and forte
but what do the cubs got to do with this thread?
and just in case you dont understand that im saying you failed
did you even read the thread? the falcon combo was already put in thereOriginally Posted by nnarum
Two more to throw in for better than the Bears combo...
Man its pretty clear Bears fans cant take jokes on here
I failed cause i posted a funny gif of a bear scared of a lionoh.
i can take a joke and i seen wat you was tryin to do there......but the only problom is a baby bear is a ......wait for it.........cub
and how much of the offense will run throw cutler and forte
one of them will be featured in a play 100% of the time
Trying to bring Dallas into this is just laughable.
yup.at that lists of combos