- Oct 27, 2007
- 3,311
- 53
Originally Posted by OHyeah10
Originally Posted by StroShow4
i bet he doesnt care about his teammates anymore. just chucking every shot he gets an ounce of daylight�
Not sure if srs
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by OHyeah10
Originally Posted by StroShow4
i bet he doesnt care about his teammates anymore. just chucking every shot he gets an ounce of daylight�
I don't want to live on this planet anymore.Originally Posted by LESGodSonC0
Originally Posted by SoHi 23
yall not getting CP3 man.
We didn't get Carmelo either...
Oh.
And Bledsoe? How about that unprotected Minnesota first rounder?Originally Posted by Zyzz
Foye is garbage and Aminu is a terrible player. dont know what the hype is around him.
@HowardBeckNYT Howard Beck
ESPN cites source saying CP3 won't push for NY deal, knowing Knicks don't have trade assets "He wouldn't insult the Hornets by doing that."
Yeah, there's totally no difference between trading for Melo then and trading for Paul now...
Yall traded for Melo so you can trade for Paul, right?
Problem is CP3 reportedly doesn't want to sign an extension if he lands in Boston. Not sure why given the Celtics will still have that window of opportunity to win a title in the next two years. It's the best case scenario for New Orleans though, gives them an elite point guard and I assume Boston would throw a bit more to sweeten the deal (couple picks, maybe an extra body or two). I think the Lakers, Clippers and Celtics all have enough to give up for Paul IMO.Originally Posted by SCuse7
Or Rondo and Two first round picks...that sounds the best to me
Everyone besides Pierce if off contract after next year so I don't understand why he wouldn't want us to build a team around him...?Originally Posted by CripwalkinK
Problem is CP3 reportedly doesn't want to sign an extension if he lands in Boston. Not sure why given the Celtics will still have that window of opportunity to win a title in the next two years. It's the best case scenario for New Orleans though, gives them an elite point guard and I assume Boston would throw a bit more to sweeten the deal (couple picks, maybe an extra body or two). I think the Lakers, Clippers and Celtics all have enough to give up for Paul IMO.Originally Posted by SCuse7
Or Rondo and Two first round picks...that sounds the best to me
Originally Posted by Zyzz
Shannon Brown is a free agent and if im the Lakers the first person headed out of LA is Artest, dude is straight garbage.
Veteran's deal? MLE? I still need to look into the new CBA's FA policies.Originally Posted by JapanAir21
How would the Lakers sign Tyson Chandler exactly?
I doubt Hornets want any long-term, expensive deals.
I don't see a motive for the Hornets to accept any Knicks deal unless Paul gives them an ultimatum by saying "Knicks or I leave". There's other teams with better talent / picks to offer.Originally Posted by CP1708
Mike has a point, he's basically saying if they trade Paul, they're dead anyways, blow it all up and start fresh, getting Billups and Turiaf gives them a year to struggle, then they have all the money in the world, they'll have a top 3 pick since they would then suck royally, draft a stud, sign a free agent with all that money to play with said stud, and start over from there.
Take the Clips deal, they get average players, longer contract issues tied to them, and maybe a nice pick or two. The picks are tempting, the money for average deals is not. Its the type of half @#$ trade that doesn't make you a power player, but doesn't make you the #1 pick in the draft either, mediocre forever. The Knick deal lets you bottom all the way out, luck into a star kid, and then try to come up from there, ala OKC style.
Are we going to have fans from every team come up with trades for Paul that will never ever ever happen? Gonna make this thread real long if so.
No, more like you have no idea what you're talking about.Originally Posted by CripwalkinK
Veteran's deal? MLE? I still need to look into the new CBA's FA policies.Originally Posted by JapanAir21
How would the Lakers sign Tyson Chandler exactly?
I doubt Hornets want any long-term, expensive deals.
That's fair though cause Hornets would want players coming off the books in a hurry.
Clippers' offer would be intriguing as well, probably the best on the "table" at this point.
Originally Posted by CP1708
Mike has a point, he's basically saying if they trade Paul, they're dead anyways, blow it all up and start fresh, getting Billups and Turiaf gives them a year to struggle, then they have all the money in the world, they'll have a top 3 pick since they would then suck royally, draft a stud, sign a free agent with all that money to play with said stud, and start over from there.
Take the Clips deal, they get average players, longer contract issues tied to them, and maybe a nice pick or two. The picks are tempting, the money for average deals is not. Its the type of half @#$ trade that doesn't make you a power player, but doesn't make you the #1 pick in the draft either, mediocre forever. The Knick deal lets you bottom all the way out, luck into a star kid, and then try to come up from there, ala OKC style.
Are we going to have fans from every team come up with trades for Paul that will never ever ever happen? Gonna make this thread real long if so.
If lakers were smart they would look into signing Michael Redd, dirt cheap and should be in great shape.Originally Posted by franchise3
Lakers don't expect Shannon Brown back.