- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,216
- 202,649
not what i'm saying.. of course any basketball team will be better for having chris paul on it.. but i'm not sure it's the best fit for the team or the player (chris paul)Originally Posted by ill steelo
So Chris Paul handling the ball instead of harden is a bad thing?
A pure PG like Paul is perfect. He's certainly a better fit than Westbrook. More willing (and better) passer, better jump shooter, and a comparable rebounder.
i think having chris paul would be too much and i don't know if you would get the most out of all players involved.. hence why i say the thunder could get away with a jordan era type point guard (since i expect KD and harden to both have the ball in their hands quite a bit anyways)
if harden wasn't there, i would be more inclined to say yea go ahead.. cause that KD & chris paul combo (with ibaka) would be a thing of beauty