- 2,358
- 595
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2004
majority of these NT chicks are A) lesbians or B) never gonna get wifed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by kix4kix
I hope you hyphenate the paycheck, and the heavy lifting, and the bills.
Originally Posted by SiMPLYDiMPLY
I wouldn't.
1. I am Jessica Siniscalchi, forever and always.
2. My lastname is unique and makes up for my mundane first name
3. My surname is as much apart of who i am as my given name is. And how do i look changing my first name in the middle of my life?
4. Its too much trouble to change your last name and all documents. and then what if you get divorced? Way too much trouble. My mom still has problems because of conflicting last names and stuff since getting divorced.
5. I probably am never getting married anyhow. I am down to be with someone for a long stretch of time.. hell, even forever, but i don't need the title of "wife". A pretty ring and giant expensive wedding has no correlation to how much love is in the relationship. Not to mention a waste of money... when you can use that money towards building a home and life together. I would probably only get married for the tax breaks.
6. If we have children though, they can have his last name, lest it be something unfortunate like Gaylord or something ( i do know someone with that last name) just looking out for my children.
But like i was saying, they can have their fathers surname. No hyphens, nothing. I understand wanting to carry on your families "legacy" and what have you. I have a brother, he can take care of that on my side.
Originally Posted by SiMPLYDiMPLY
Originally Posted by kix4kix
I hope you hyphenate the paycheck, and the heavy lifting, and the bills.
are you going to hyphenate the birth of the child?
she has one, you have the other,
Marriage is a religious bond, you the mans wife, put your pride to the side and start a new life with your new bond. These pseudo feminists kill me.
preach! that's the problem with modern-day notions of marriage. i think people nowadays view marriage as a joint-venture, instead of a merger. andthe faux feminists are too concerned with gender roles, etc. they say they want equality--but they really want to be men.
these chicks also have a problem with the vows, to Love, Honor, and Obey. Honor = respect, and obey = submit to. When you start talking that stuff,they get to neck-rollin, talking about how 'they're not gonna "obey" no man...smh.
i think the wife should take the husbands last name--hyphenated or not doesn't matter to me. would i let that keep me from wifing her?? i don't know.but it would definitely raise some red flags about her cooperation and willingness to submit to the game.
Further research/study: Podcasts by Tariq Nasheed, particularly 'The Seven Levels of Disrespect by Women.'
I wouldn't have it any other wayOriginally Posted by kix4kix
I hope you hyphenate the paycheck, and the heavy lifting, and the bills.
you make a compelling argument.
supert1ght- yes i am a hardcore bulldike, my man. "awww lawdeh noesss, the womens gon' & got themselves an opinions! they must be the homosecksuals!"
Originally Posted by starzinoureyes
not a feminist @ all. merely arguing both points.
my last name is important to me. it's my identity. my last name. so i'm just supposed to take my husband's last name because of tradition? i just think it's silly how someone's response was ownership... like on some caveman type *%++. if it's a partnership, it should be just that. men are no one's proprietor, and likewise. this whole false sense of entitlement really cracks me up. men are entitled to give their wives their last name?
supert1ght- yes i am a hardcore bulldike, my man. "awww lawdeh noesss, the womens gon' & got themselves an opinions! they must be the homosecksuals!"
Not everyone feels that wayOriginally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by starzinoureyes
not a feminist @ all. merely arguing both points.
my last name is important to me. it's my identity. my last name. so i'm just supposed to take my husband's last name because of tradition? i just think it's silly how someone's response was ownership... like on some caveman type *%++. if it's a partnership, it should be just that. men are no one's proprietor, and likewise. this whole false sense of entitlement really cracks me up. men are entitled to give their wives their last name?
supert1ght- yes i am a hardcore bulldike, my man. "awww lawdeh noesss, the womens gon' & got themselves an opinions! they must be the homosecksuals!"
Once you get married you are keeping your identity as an individual but you are starting a new life. People forget that marriage is a religious bond, wanna keep your name don't get married.
Since when is marriage a religious bond? Get out of here with that @#$$.Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by Fanatic15
What difference would it make really. Think about it. In your day to day life how will it affect your life. If it does, you don't need to be getting married. Why should I have to give up the name I have lived my entire life w/ just because I am the female and he is the male? It makes no logical sense. It's one thing if you want to, but no one should be required and it should NEVER be a deal breaker imo.Originally Posted by kix4kix
Originally Posted by Fanatic15
My name is going to be hyphenated. The only reason to really take a husbands name other than ego is to have the same name as your kids for example. But it really makes no difference, thats why the kids will be hyphenated as well!
Marriage is a religious bond, you the mans wife, put your pride to the side and start a new life with your new bond. These pseudo feminists kill me.
So if you DO get married, you don't need a ring?Originally Posted by SiMPLYDiMPLY
5. I probably am never getting married anyhow. I am down to be with someone for a long stretch of time.. hell, even forever, but i don't need the title of "wife". A pretty ring and giant expensive wedding has no correlation to how much love is in the relationship. Not to mention a waste of money... when you can use that money towards building a home and life together. I would probably only get married for the tax breaks.
Originally Posted by DearWinter219
Marriage has BEEN a religious bond...in every religion... um...duh?
It's killing me to read all these women saying MY this and MY that......MY identity... MY life, etc. Then why join into a "we" type thing if it's all about you? You can't give that man anything, can you? Selfish.... And didn't Shakespeare say "A rose by any other name would still smell as sweet"? You'll still be who you were, so why not give that man the GIFT he's earned? Why so serious? Ya'll always pick fights over the little picture which only shows that ya'll never see the bigger one.
Originally Posted by Nawth21
Originally Posted by DearWinter219
Marriage has BEEN a religious bond...in every religion... um...duh?
It's killing me to read all these women saying MY this and MY that......MY identity... MY life, etc. Then why join into a "we" type thing if it's all about you? You can't give that man anything, can you? Selfish.... And didn't Shakespeare say "A rose by any other name would still smell as sweet"? You'll still be who you were, so why not give that man the GIFT he's earned? Why so serious? Ya'll always pick fights over the little picture which only shows that ya'll never see the bigger one.
Man Rilla who pissed in your cheerios this morning?