- 680
- 1,139
Me too just a pic I found along the wayWhite/ sport turquoise to me means this:
Why no air max 93 og retro?
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by vig09,
- Start date
- 680
- 1,139
- 680
- 1,139
- 680
- 1,139
rbk93
Supporter
- 14,184
- 13,462
Need to repaint the pair I own, messed them up throwing them in the washer.
- 680
- 1,139
Mine haven’t even left the house and need a repaint bro yellowed in the first year don’t know why
- 680
- 1,139
- 680
- 1,139
- 680
- 1,139
- 680
- 1,139
- 8,799
- 10,386
They've come up with poor excuses, nothing that really makes sense when you look at the vapormax.
I think the real reason is fat bags pop easier and Nike doesn't want to deal with all the returns
They can deal with me not copping if they don't make them how they're supposed to be made though
I'll wait another 25 years if I have to
I think the real reason is fat bags pop easier and Nike doesn't want to deal with all the returns
They can deal with me not copping if they don't make them how they're supposed to be made though
I'll wait another 25 years if I have to
- 7,299
- 13,429
Probably combination of cheaper production processes and the fact they're not a performance shoe anymore.
- 680
- 1,139
Makes sense
- 680
- 1,139
- 8,799
- 10,386
They never were a performance shoe really. No one looked at Nike back then for performance, it was all about the design. Form over function used to be Nikes mantra.
- 37,830
- 15,641
Need AF
- 680
- 1,139
Me too
- 8,799
- 10,386
Who doesn't like booty?
- 680
- 1,139
Apparently Nike doesn’t lool
- 680
- 1,139
- 37,830
- 15,641
Is it really? Then I'm in. I need a new pair.
- 1,270
- 369
reliable source? Ill buy a pair on discount
This is the colourway releasing in 2018 by the way
- 680
- 1,139
- 680
- 1,139
The bottom release line is courtesy of @AIRMAXDISCIPLE
- 7,299
- 13,429
And Australia.
