- 3,969
- 535
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
I wonder why JB cannot retro the AJ OG colorways like they did in 1999, 2000 and 2001?
Also the 2003 AJ 12 retros in black/white and black/red were still OK, where i only disliked the plastic laceloops and the thin leather on the sides.
Somehow the AJ 11 and AJ 7 retros seem however look quite authentic to the OG releases, only differs in some shapes and colortones (OG's
have less glossy paintjobs on the AJ 7 and 9).
Then the AJ 13 retros look off when looking on them from the top compared to the OG's and they feel much much stiffer too.
The AJ3 white/cements have a very glossy upper leather which made it look strange.
Now the current samples of the AJ 3 black/cements and AJ 10 white/black-varsity reds are causing uproar again
and i wonder why JB must cause such nonsense changes to such classic styled Air Jordans.
They can release more retro+ colorways if they want, that's OK, but if they release an OG colorway, then they should
keep the same coloring!
Also the 2003 AJ 12 retros in black/white and black/red were still OK, where i only disliked the plastic laceloops and the thin leather on the sides.
Somehow the AJ 11 and AJ 7 retros seem however look quite authentic to the OG releases, only differs in some shapes and colortones (OG's
have less glossy paintjobs on the AJ 7 and 9).
Then the AJ 13 retros look off when looking on them from the top compared to the OG's and they feel much much stiffer too.
The AJ3 white/cements have a very glossy upper leather which made it look strange.
Now the current samples of the AJ 3 black/cements and AJ 10 white/black-varsity reds are causing uproar again
and i wonder why JB must cause such nonsense changes to such classic styled Air Jordans.
They can release more retro+ colorways if they want, that's OK, but if they release an OG colorway, then they should
keep the same coloring!