Quote:
you buy jordans to look like a basketball fan?
You completely missed the point there.
Whether we like it or not, whether we intend to or not, what we choose to wear makes a statement about us as individuals. Our likes, our sense of style, and even our personalities are reflected in the way we dress.
The Air Jordan is, obviously, rooted in the game of basketball. For years, when someone has worn the Jumpman, most people tended to infer that they were looking at someone who was at least a fan of basketball or athletics. The brand STOOD for something.
There's a difference between an isolated purchase and brand LOYALTY. If you're loyal to a brand, odds are there's a reason behind it that extends beyond sheer aesthetics.
When I wear Jordan brand gear, I of course do so because I like the individual design I've purchased - but also because I love the game of basketball and I've been a Michael Jordan fan for the majority of my life.
Let's be realistic here. There is something MORE to the brand - and to each of our individual purchases - than the intrinsic quality of each product. There are more comfortable walking shoes than Air Jordans - but most of us here wear Air Jordans for casual use. As mentioned, Fubu could put out the most attractive apparel collection in the history of mankind and virtually no one would buy it - because no one wants to wear the Fubu name anymore.
Let's say David Duke starts a Klan Klothing Kompany. They could produce the best looking and highest quality clothing in the world at a bargain price, but would you wear it? Meaning counts.
Perhaps 25% of the people on this board love a brand like abercrombie and 40% of the people on this board consider it corny and wouldn't be caught dead wearing it. That has to do with the brand's IMAGE as much, if not more, than the products they sell.
For better or worse, that's how we all understand fashion to work.
If you change your brands image, if you change the meaning BEHIND the brand, you risk alienating your core audience in attempt to expand your appeal. That strikes me as common sense.
Now, you can say, "why even care what other people are wearing, just do you" but the problem still comes back to the following question: does the brand still represent you to the point you feel comfortable representing IT? If the direction of the brand shifts to the extent that die hard fans feel it no longer applies to them - that the brand is simply taking their loyalty for granted - then I believe that constitutes a problem.
Is it a widespread problem now? Of course not.
Have they added more new fans in recent years? It would seem so.
However, is there a growing sense of dissatisfaction among many of the brand's core fans? I believe so. I see it on NikeTalk AND in real life, even among fans who know Jordans by vague description or nickname ("the hares" etc.) rather than by specific number and colorway. They sense the declining quality among retros.
The average kid on the street doesn't care about the UNDFTD IVs now, but the average kid on the street doesn't have any qualms with fake Jordans, either. However, if in 5 years the "crossover" market swells to the point where the effect of UNDFTD type products has become visible to the average kid on the street, then you have yourself an image problem that DOES have some reach.
We're on the vanguard when it comes to Jordan products. We know what's coming out 6 months from now while the average fan only knows what's out NOW. We're more attuned the nuance in a sneaker brand's direction because we follow them so closely. So, if they change their direction in a way that displeases us, eventually that sentiment may spread to others if the trend is allowed to continue. Perhaps only a small portion of fans will feel the same way, perhaps the effect will be significant.
We've been complaining about fakes for years now. Early on, people didn't consider it a major concern. Who cares if a few sneaker nerds have a tougher time buying old shoes on ebay? How does that effect Jordan? Jordan doesn't sell OGs anyway. Today, there's an enormous fake problem virtually every major metropolitan area. Its traveled up the chain pretty quickly. Its not just a sneaker fans problem anymore. Fakes are already hurting retailers and they will increasingly harm companies like Jordan brand. In many cases, fakes aren't even CONSIDERED fakes by the average sneaker consumer, but "exclusives." All of this limited release hype only makes THAT problem worse, too. Maybe that Laker AJ III was just another online exclusive.
Since we pay such close attention, we're able to pinpoint SPECIFIC problems and causes, articulating them earlier and more precisely than the mass market. Jordan brand has an image problem with regard to build quality these days. Ask the average kid on the street what, specifically, is wrong and they might tell you, "I don't know, they just feel cheaper than they used to." Ask a NT member why and you'll hear a laundry list of differences between an original product and its retro equivalent. Of course, who's even asking the average kid on the street what they think? A focus group is a completely different dynamic and sales figures only offer whether or not someone IS buying - not how satisfied or dissatisfied they are with their purchase. So, don't discount the criticism of NikeTalk members. Not every complaint here is exclusive to NT. Sometimes these issues just hurt us first.
Lets say I get fed up with Nike after 5 low quality retros or nike.com after being burned by 3 limited online exclusives. Given the buying frequency of dedicated sneaker fans, we may reach those thresholds within the course of just a few months.
Obviously there's a stronger and far more loyal core audience surrounding Jordan products than Fubu, Ecko, and the like. That said, although it would be more difficult to alienate the core consumer, the easiest way to do so is to eliminate the very foundation that has predicated loyal interest in Jordan products for the past two decades. They have a long way to go before fans like myself stop buying the product altogether, but the question is simply this: are they going in the right direction? I don't think so, and I'd rather speak on it now rather than later.
Quote:
to be honest comparing the jordan line a 20 year MAJOR brand success business to some fly by night apparel company that has 1000 people wearing it then blows up is ridiculous.
They've had 20 years of success at selling basketball-oriented products, not 20 years of success as an "urban" fashion brand and/or a hipster fashion brand. Success in one field doesn't easily translate into success in another. Anyone like that Kobe Bryant rap album?
You have to be true to yourself.