- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,806
- 62,652
WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - Agatha All Along new ep every Wednesday
...So
formerly beyondmeasure
- Apr 25, 2013
- 17,090
- 7,899
.
Last edited:
- Sep 1, 2012
- 688
- 77
Most likely there will be hints on ALL the after credits scenes.
- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
Yeah but they compete for the same, time, viewership and sometimes the same dollars. If it wasn't for the Kentucky derby, and the package money fight, AoU would have another $100 in the bank. People couldn't spend 90 on the fight and money for the tickets.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
Last I checked the marvel movies weren't even in full swing with any kind of vision until Disney came along and bought them.
Exactly what difference do you see then? What great vision was there with IM that'd give you any indication of further plans?
The transition from before IM to after IM has stuck with the same plan. Feige is still in charge. Nothing has changed there.
The dude that's head of the tv is Jeph Loeb, dude came up through the comics and was suited for the position given his work in tv. So between them 2 coordinating the tv and movies exactly changed from when they did IM to when they did Avengers? Other than continued success. Where exactly is this battle of execs? Can you name them? I don't think you can prove that the one voice one leadership that you saw with Marvel when they made IM suddenly changed when they did Thor or Cap or Avengers or GotG.
Keep in mind Disney didn't just by the studio it bought Marvel Ent in it's entirety. They're making more money off merchandising than the movies.
Last edited:
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- Apr 4, 2006
- 42,963
- 15,346
Both IM and IH indicated the possibility of a shared universe. This was before Disney's acquisition. I don't think Marvel was lacking in vision prior to the acquisition.
But at the same time, I also don't see any evidence of friction between Marvel and Disney. They made 9 movies together and the shared universe got better as it went on.
But at the same time, I also don't see any evidence of friction between Marvel and Disney. They made 9 movies together and the shared universe got better as it went on.
Last edited:
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
That article mostly deals with movie guys seeing the tv guys a certain way and the difference netflix makes since it's basically the Marvel guys chance to sort of do a tv thing.
The only real hard Disney related thing there was what ABC wants to do and the speculation that the movies would ignore the work done in AOS. They mention other non-netflix shows but give no details about them actually happening other than to say they will happen and complicate things. If you're selling a certain narrative about the current state of Marvel studios, statements like that only help to keep generating that sort of sensationalism. Like I said though talk like that is par for the course and usual when we're talking about studios on the tv and movie scale.
Reading it, I didn't get the idea that it's Disney forcing Marvel to bring more shows on ABC. Sounds more like Loeb who is running tv and animations sees the opportunity to have more shows on ABC while also doing netflix shows. Not much conflict when all the ABC shows have to do is keep a tight continuity with each other and continue to crossover with the movies when they want. They haven't even done another show yet anyway. Netflix got their first phase in place and according to this article are unsure what to do next or how to approach using Blade, GR, and Punisher cuz they kill and/or fight the supernatural.
I'm asking somebody to point to how Disney has suddenly changed things in the movies and since there's only one other show on tv I can't see how there's suddenly multiple voices.
If everybody is reporting back to Feige when it comes to the shared universe I don't see the problem.
The only real hard Disney related thing there was what ABC wants to do and the speculation that the movies would ignore the work done in AOS. They mention other non-netflix shows but give no details about them actually happening other than to say they will happen and complicate things. If you're selling a certain narrative about the current state of Marvel studios, statements like that only help to keep generating that sort of sensationalism. Like I said though talk like that is par for the course and usual when we're talking about studios on the tv and movie scale.
Reading it, I didn't get the idea that it's Disney forcing Marvel to bring more shows on ABC. Sounds more like Loeb who is running tv and animations sees the opportunity to have more shows on ABC while also doing netflix shows. Not much conflict when all the ABC shows have to do is keep a tight continuity with each other and continue to crossover with the movies when they want. They haven't even done another show yet anyway. Netflix got their first phase in place and according to this article are unsure what to do next or how to approach using Blade, GR, and Punisher cuz they kill and/or fight the supernatural.
And it continues after Disney's acquisition.
I'm asking somebody to point to how Disney has suddenly changed things in the movies and since there's only one other show on tv I can't see how there's suddenly multiple voices.
If everybody is reporting back to Feige when it comes to the shared universe I don't see the problem.
Last edited:
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- Apr 4, 2006
- 42,963
- 15,346
I think dude's argument was that IM was a successful hit before Disney picked it up and was implying that Marvel is flourishing despite Disney's interference.
Hard argument to prove or disprove
Hard argument to prove or disprove
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
That sounds ridiculous. Aint up to nobody to disprove it though.
Especially since it seems solely motivated by that article just posted. Exactly what could be brought up in the movies and one tv show that could prove that?
I mean I've heard ppl constantly complaining and worrying some parts of Marvel will be "disneyfied" but that's usually do to their own ignorance (not knowing about the movie studios Disney owns and shows they've produced in the past) especially now when you got something like the DD series that's more mature than what they've done in the past. And pretty soon Marvel is gonna bite that bullet in some form and give fans a live action Blade and Punisher that'll be killing in the same shared universe. Not sure what's gonna be disneyfied about that.
What dude is saying about too many voices and battles of execs really can't be proved when you can't name the execs or extra voices. I mean Feige been there and so has Loeb. We basically getting in to that "higher up" area ppl like to trot out to back up a theory that doesn't have much support.
Especially since it seems solely motivated by that article just posted. Exactly what could be brought up in the movies and one tv show that could prove that?
I mean I've heard ppl constantly complaining and worrying some parts of Marvel will be "disneyfied" but that's usually do to their own ignorance (not knowing about the movie studios Disney owns and shows they've produced in the past) especially now when you got something like the DD series that's more mature than what they've done in the past. And pretty soon Marvel is gonna bite that bullet in some form and give fans a live action Blade and Punisher that'll be killing in the same shared universe. Not sure what's gonna be disneyfied about that.
What dude is saying about too many voices and battles of execs really can't be proved when you can't name the execs or extra voices. I mean Feige been there and so has Loeb. We basically getting in to that "higher up" area ppl like to trot out to back up a theory that doesn't have much support.
Last edited:
- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,505
- 21,087
I take offense to the article writer saying Blade would put netflix on the goofy side. It's not like marvel doesn't have goofy crap on their other shows or movies. What would be goofy about Blade slicing up vampire fools and leaving blood everywhere? Daredevil is a blind guy with radar in his head who had some fight training from another blind guy. Plus the main villain was some albino gorilla who had temper tantrums.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
Stretching it calling Fisk an albino 
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,873
- 61,622
Would a Blade series work with a Netflx budget? I know they gave Marco Polo like $90 million dollars. I'd imaging with all the effects and all that, it'll need more than that.
- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,505
- 21,087
Stretching it calling Fisk an albino
I was going to say vanilla gorilla but that term is overused.
Yeah, the marco polo budget was probably crazy. The cgi needed for Blade might be costly and something they want to avoid.
- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,505
- 21,087
Or they could just do a lot of heavy makeup like other vampire tv shows. The Strain on fx has good character designs.
I actually forgot there was a blade tv show years back on spike tv. Best thing about that show was Jill Wagner.
I actually forgot there was a blade tv show years back on spike tv. Best thing about that show was Jill Wagner.
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- Apr 4, 2006
- 42,963
- 15,346
Albino gorilla is a an apt comparison
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,873
- 61,622
Info about the Pym Particles
"Dr. Henry Pym (Michael Douglas) originally discovered and isolated a rare group of subatomic particles, which have become known as the 'Pym Particles', which could increase or decrease the size and mass of objects or living beings." The description continues, "The Pym Particles work by stunting matter into the Kosmos Dimension when shrinking a subject or accruing extra matter from that dimension when enlarging.
http://marvel.com/antman#/antview
"Dr. Henry Pym (Michael Douglas) originally discovered and isolated a rare group of subatomic particles, which have become known as the 'Pym Particles', which could increase or decrease the size and mass of objects or living beings." The description continues, "The Pym Particles work by stunting matter into the Kosmos Dimension when shrinking a subject or accruing extra matter from that dimension when enlarging.
http://marvel.com/antman#/antview
- Apr 18, 2013
- 3,872
- 2,293
Finished the Spiderverse storyline. It was good af
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- Apr 4, 2006
- 42,963
- 15,346
Spider verse is awesome man. Sucks thinking that secret wars would be killing off all those spideys.
- Apr 18, 2013
- 3,872
- 2,293
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- Apr 4, 2006
- 42,963
- 15,346
They did? I must've missed that.
- Apr 18, 2013
- 3,872
- 2,293
Here ya go.
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- Apr 4, 2006
- 42,963
- 15,346
Oh right. I remember now. It didn't connect at the time, I thought that whole exchange was strange
- Sep 1, 2012
- 688
- 77
Many I gotta get my Secret Wars on... stayed away cuz I have mega-screw-everything events but it looks to be interesting.
- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,806
- 62,652
Surprised SamJack doesn't have a 50 film contract with Marvel?
He also, surprisingly, won't be in CW.
He also, surprisingly, won't be in CW.
Last edited:
- Feb 14, 2007
- 21,609
- 18,659
Called it about a certain character....if it is indeed true.
Rumor: A New Hulk May Appear In The MCU
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2015/06...-in-the-mcu-3275444?lt_source=external,manual
Somebody close to production has reached out and informed us that General Thunderbolt Ross will indeed be Hulk-ing out in Civil War. Additionally, as Bleeding Cool reported, Bruce Banner WILL be involved and I'm hearing there is a fight between Hulk and Red Hulk that is supposed to rival the Hulkbuster fight from Age of Ultron. Generally we don't report on unsubstantiated rumors from unknown sources, but now that we at least have WAW's scoop to compare it to, it seems a lot more likely and thus worth reporting on as a rumor.
We reached out to Marvel for confirmation, but as of now our request has gone without reply.
http://moviepilot.com/posts/2015/06...-in-the-mcu-3275444?lt_source=external,manual
Somebody close to production has reached out and informed us that General Thunderbolt Ross will indeed be Hulk-ing out in Civil War. Additionally, as Bleeding Cool reported, Bruce Banner WILL be involved and I'm hearing there is a fight between Hulk and Red Hulk that is supposed to rival the Hulkbuster fight from Age of Ultron. Generally we don't report on unsubstantiated rumors from unknown sources, but now that we at least have WAW's scoop to compare it to, it seems a lot more likely and thus worth reporting on as a rumor.
We reached out to Marvel for confirmation, but as of now our request has gone without reply.
