WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - Agatha All Along new ep every Wednesday

Nah it makes sense to have Captain Marvel come in between IW movies given her cosmic background. Putting BP in between those two movies makes no sense. I doubt the Inhumans script is close to finished so changing it wouldnt be a problem but still. It was better off in between the two. Truth be told they shouldve just tossed Spidey in some March or August date or something and kept everything the same but I doubt they wanted 4 movies in one year


How doesn't it make sense when we don't even really know everything that's going on?
it breaks momentum imo

with two cosmic films in between IW 1 & 2 it gives you the sense of how the story is gonna play out. Now with BP in there it gets weird but you're right, we don't have an idea what's planned
 
  Ashton Kutcher for Spidey !!!!!  Yup I said it
jazz-thrown-o.gif
 
Wow yall dudes went a bit out there a few pgs back. Talking about Fergie's husband and Ryan Reynolds? :lol :x


OKB right about Hollywood and pushing the same white dudes due to racism and sexism even though they suck and aren't stars.


If Marvel wanted to, introducing Miles wouldn't be a big problem. Even if it is in Civil War. They're not doing the comic version of CW pg for pg. It'd probably be easier to fit in Miles in some ways. So makes no sense to bring up how much CW sold as a comic. It's not some untouchable flawless story.
Of course it wouldn't be a big problem. He's a great character. It's just not his time.
According to who?

That reply isn't really giving a good reason for why he can't be involved with Peter or instead of Peter.

If you don't want him that's one thing but I'm not seeing a reason why Miles couldn't be introduced in the upcoming movies.
 
Last edited:
it's kind of sad knowing that BP is delayed when you look back and read about how Chad has been preparing for the role..
 
According to who?

That reply isn't really giving a good reason for why he can't be involved with Peter or instead of Peter.

If you don't want him that's one thing but I'm nto seeing a reason why Miles couldn't be introduced in the upcoming movies.
According to me of course.

Why should he be introduced now? Peter hasn't been used to his maximum potential yet, so I don't see why he needs to be skipped over for him. Can they replace Miles with Peter and make it work? Sure, but why rush.
 
Last edited:
so when will be his time after the 8th peter PArker movie, 9th? 10?
They could make another decade of spiderman films and it still won't be his time.
This just sounds like bull ****.

You just sound anti-Miles now. Don't think for a sec Marvel won't want to capitalize on a Miles movie soon.

Sony, they'd probably never think it's time but Marvel is running **** now.
 
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure the press release specifically said "Peter Parker" so this Miles talk is redundant
 
One knowledgeable source sees the move as a first step to Marvel re-acquiring the rights to Spider-Man down the road, while another believes Disney is positioning itself to acquire Sony should it ever become available.
 
Last edited:
According to who?


That reply isn't really giving a good reason for why he can't be involved with Peter or instead of Peter.


If you don't want him that's one thing but I'm nto seeing a reason why Miles couldn't be introduced in the upcoming movies.


According to me of course.

Why should he be introduced now?
Cuz Marvel would hypothetically want to use him now. Same way they used black Nick Fury instead of the OG and put Hawkeye and Black Widow in the Avengers instead of Ant-Man and Wasp who were apart of the OG team.
Peter hasn't been used to his maximum potential yet, so I don't see why he needs to be skipped over for him.
That's not Marvel's fault. If anything that's a good reason for why Marvel would want to continue to distance themselves from past trash and change who is under the mask.
Can they replace Miles with Peter and make it work? Sure, but why rush.
It's only a rush to you.
This just sounds like bull ****.


You just sound anti-Miles now. Don't think for a sec Marvel won't want to capitalize on a Miles movie soon.


I've already said Miles is a great character.
Yeah but your reasons for why he shouldn't be used in the movies don't make sense.

I'm left with that or possible bias.
 
Last edited:
http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/10/8010259/marvel-moves-release-dates-because-spider-man

Here's the full list.

Avengers: Age of Ultron: May 1st, 2015
Ant-Man: July 17th, 2015
Captain America: Civil War: May 6th, 2016
Doctor Strange: November 4th, 2016
Guardians of the Galaxy 2: May 5th, 2017
Spider-Man: July 28th, 2017
Thor: Ragnarok: November 3rd, 2017
Avengers: Infinity War, Part 1: May 4th, 2018
Black Panther: July 6th, 2018
Captain Marvel: November 2nd, 2018
Avengers: Infinity War, Part 2: May 3th, 2019
Inhumans: July 12th, 2019
 
It's only a rush to you.
Nah. Plenty feel the same way.

My reason makes perfect sense. I want to see Peter. It's as simple as that. Miles is great, but they're still different characters. If they want to throw him in there to foreshadow his eventual appearance. Cool. I just don't want to see him take over the Spiderman mantle yet.

If they decide to use Miles soon, I won't have a MAJOR problem, because I like him. I like what Bendis is doing with him. I just like Peter more.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom