- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,666
- 106,295
Again, it's kind of complicated to compare the two because take the ending of "Fellowship of the Ring" for example.
It culminates at the battle in the forest with the Uruk-Hai. Boromir dies trying to save the Hobbits, Aragorn kills the leader of the Uruk-Hai, and Frodo sneaks off from the group. The fellowship is disbanded shortly thereafter with them at their lowest point (Legolas literally says "We failed...").
But Aragorn tells them to quit whining because Merry and Pippen are in need of rescue. Frodo and Sam set off on their quest to Mordor. There was a sense of direction for the upcoming film while simultaneously ending the first chapter.
Infinity War's ending was kinda aimless with everybody dying. No set-up for the sequel. Just fade to white. It was the MCU equivalent of the Sopranos finale. It was a non-ending.
Isn't it a bit obvious what the aim is for the remaining Avengers?
I understand the gripes and the elements that could have been added or removed, but for what they accomplished it's quite a feat. Dudes bust their *** to make a balanced film for everyone and did a great job.
Plus one of NTs greatest past times is questioning people's intelligence based on TV/movies (general observation, not you), so I don't get the need for spoon-feeding, can't be both ways.