- Mar 14, 2009
- 4,240
- 1,216
He made a good spiderman. Just couldn't stand him as peter.
WELCOME TO THE MARVEL MULTIVERSE -*RIP STAN LEE & Boseman* - Agatha All Along new ep every Wednesday
- Mar 14, 2009
- 4,240
- 1,216
Well at least they're getting rid of Garfield.
Idk. It's like Sony doesn't know what to do.
That's for sure.
- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,697
- 106,366
Bruh, Josh and Drake Drake? Lmao
- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,516
- 21,106
He already voices the cartoon. Drake and Josh was entertaining btw.
- Mar 12, 2011
- 7,833
- 8,466
Sony needs to just give up
- Sep 21, 2012
- 7,703
- 10,619
I don't believe it. Ol Canadian Wall Street Journal typa sources
- Dec 3, 2009
- 39,332
- 19,784
Sony running around like a headless chicken trying to find the panic button...they have no clue wtf to do 
Just give up the rights...forget about superhero movies
Just give up the rights...forget about superhero movies
- Nov 14, 2012
- 36,045
- 12,024
somehow drake from drake and josh would only be the 4th worst possible casting choice listed
also judging by the toys hawkeye still looks like lesbian neo
also judging by the toys hawkeye still looks like lesbian neo
- Oct 10, 2013
- 43,425
- 42,998
Yaaaaaaaaaaas
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,873
- 50,393
You can't write this stuff man. My body is ready if they end up picking Tobey
Real tears will be shed with how much I'll be laughing then.Sony
I specifically like how Marvel is okay with this and know it's possibly gonna be apart of the plans.For old time's sake
View media item 1246727
Last edited:
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,889
- 61,636
If they cast Tpbey, that's how you know they desperate. Tobey wanted a bunch of money for SM4 and Sony didn't wanna give it to him. If they hire him now and pay him what he originally wanted
The worst of it would be just because Tobey's back, people will automatically give the next film a pass
The worst of it would be just because Tobey's back, people will automatically give the next film a pass
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,873
- 50,393
Sony was ready to give Tobey the money. That wasn't the big problem with why SM4 and SM5 never got made.
Besides they only have so many choices now. Think about it. You either stick with Garfield (but apparently he's burned his bridges), or you risk a new guy. Now while the James Bond approach will work, they'd be changing Spidey only after 2 movies while trying to keep some of the past ASM continuity. A brand new face as Peter Parker, to me the only way they don't lose money on that is if they do the opposite of what the MCU does and keeps the Spidey mask on for most of the movie. Like wait until 40 min until the mask comes off and we see PP's face.
The other choice and it's a choice cuz Tobey isn't that old is to bring the first movie Spidey back that's a familiar face to all - that was arguably in your best Spidey movies - and just have a great movie to boot (that I assume since Marvel is apart of the plans this SPidey will be in the MCU as well).
Now that I think about it they can bring Tobey back, some of that Raimi continuity and just say some of the ASM continuity was his past when he was in HS (just change up his HS experience a bit by extending it, cut out the Osborn's, etc.) and don't use any of those past villains. Just move forward.
Besides they only have so many choices now. Think about it. You either stick with Garfield (but apparently he's burned his bridges), or you risk a new guy. Now while the James Bond approach will work, they'd be changing Spidey only after 2 movies while trying to keep some of the past ASM continuity. A brand new face as Peter Parker, to me the only way they don't lose money on that is if they do the opposite of what the MCU does and keeps the Spidey mask on for most of the movie. Like wait until 40 min until the mask comes off and we see PP's face.
The other choice and it's a choice cuz Tobey isn't that old is to bring the first movie Spidey back that's a familiar face to all - that was arguably in your best Spidey movies - and just have a great movie to boot (that I assume since Marvel is apart of the plans this SPidey will be in the MCU as well).
Now that I think about it they can bring Tobey back, some of that Raimi continuity and just say some of the ASM continuity was his past when he was in HS (just change up his HS experience a bit by extending it, cut out the Osborn's, etc.) and don't use any of those past villains. Just move forward.
- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
A toby sequel will flop for being too late like Sin City did. Nowhere near as bad as Sin City who clocked in $25.6M worldwide but still the same effect.
Sir San Diego
formerly brolic scholar
- Feb 20, 2011
- 12,456
- 10,878
Last edited:
everysingletime
formerly amel223
- Apr 4, 2006
- 42,963
- 15,346
Just sounds so messy.
I'd just nuke the whole thing and start over from scratch like a crazed dictator after a hostile takeover
Tobey was my dude and I loved the original series but there are plenty of other actors who can be a good Spidey if Sony looks hard enough. Tobey had his run.
Last edited:
- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,516
- 21,106
If they cast Tpbey, that's how you know they desperate. Tobey wanted a bunch of money for SM4 and Sony didn't wanna give it to him. If they hire him now and pay him what he originally wanted
The worst of it would be just because Tobey's back, people will automatically give the next film a pass
Him being back is an automatic watch for me.
- Sep 21, 2012
- 7,703
- 10,619
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,889
- 61,636
Just trying to find anyway to get my boy Garfield out of the role.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,873
- 50,393
They do this and I feel w/e new version is gonna possibly do worse than ASM. Diminishing returns for sure.
Only reboot I see succeeding is when Marvel has complete control of Spider-Man and he's firmly in the MCU. The one cameo of Iron Man or Hulk will have it make it's money back.
What I suggest is definitely messy but it's doing the best with what you've got to work with after Sony shot themselves in the foot with a cash cow like Spidey.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,873
- 50,393
I actually have nothing against Andrew Garfield and feel when in costume along with the writing he was better at being the wise cracking Spider-Man than Tobey. I can only knock him for not being as good a PP as Tobey was but his biggest problems were that the Spidey movies he was in weren't all that good.
Anyway, I think we all should face facts, Sony is done with Garfield. aint even that I want him out of the role. It's over.
Last edited:
- Feb 10, 2014
- 4,052
- 9,724
SONY WIT DA WHAT TF
Last edited:
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,889
- 61,636
I swear if Tobey gets this role, ima be furious
I actually have nothing against Andre Garfield and feel when in costume along with the writing he was better at being the wise cracking Spider-Man than Tobey. I can only knock him for not being as good a PP as Tobey was but his biggest problems the Spidey movies he was in weren't all that good.
Anyway, I think we all should face facts, Sony is done with Garfield. aint even that I want him out of the role. It's over.
- Nov 24, 2009
- 53,516
- 21,106
^
What you have against Tobey?
What you have against Tobey?
- Nov 17, 2013
- 16,543
- 7,757
Am I wrong to think Marvel wants Sony to totally drop the ball even more with Spidey?
The decline of Sony is really a relief to other studios.
The decline of Sony is really a relief to other studios.
- Aug 6, 2012
- 57,889
- 61,636
Ohhh besides the soft Michael Cera-ish type voice, I just didn't care for his potrayal.
