- Jan 14, 2005
- 3,004
- 1,005
http://www.toy-people.com/?p=27578
Link to a bunch of Avengers:AoU Hot Toys pics. That Hulkbuster looks so gully
Link to a bunch of Avengers:AoU Hot Toys pics. That Hulkbuster looks so gully
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hulkbuster is dopehttp://www.toy-people.com/?p=27578
Link to a bunch of Avengers:AoU Hot Toys pics. That Hulkbuster looks so gully
http://www.toy-people.com/?p=27578
Link to a bunch of Avengers:AoU Hot Toys pics. That Hulkbuster looks so gully
Always wanted one of those things to put on my desk but I aint gonna spend 3-500 on an action figure
Andrew Garfield Out, Tobey Maguire Back As Peter Parker In 'The Amazing Spider-Man 3' -- Report
The recent Sony Pictures hack revealed Marvel and Sony's plans of a third sequel for "The Amazing Spider-Man." However, producers made it clear that they'd want a fresh start for the movie, where it doesn't focus on the romance as the main story but to have it as a side-story instead. Ultimately, it would also mean a change of actor to play the title role aside from Andrew Garfield.
Currently scheduled for a U.S. release in 2018, "The Amazing Spider-Man 3" could probably look into five actors befitting the role. According to Comicbook's Russ Burlingame these possible candidates include "Star Trek" actor Anton Yelchin, "The Flash" star Robbie Amell, "Divergent" actor Ansel Elgort, "Ultimate Spider-Man" mainstay Drake Bell and lastly the original Peter Parker Tobey Maguire.
When Sony's Jeff Robinov told Amy Pascal that he wants "The Amazing Spider-Man 3" to be a clean slate and to start off with an aged Peter Parker, Burlingame thought why not bring back Tobey Maguire. Burlingame assumes having the actor to portray the role again after 20 years would "drive a ton of interest from casual fans." Likewise, it would supposedly be interesting to see if Maguire can still be compelling as the Spider-Man.
WHAT
THE
****
Sony just needs to transfer those rights at this point. Just let it go.
Well at least they're getting rid of Garfield.