- 8,978
- 84
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2008
good thread
Vince Carter appreciation.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by roc boy jada,
- Start date
- 9,134
- 1,012
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2007
those two game winning 3s as a net were ice cold
- 9,134
- 1,012
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2007
those two game winning 3s as a net were ice cold
- 1,811
- 240
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
Shox ruined his body and career.
JAT
JAT
- 1,811
- 240
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2007
Shox ruined his body and career.
JAT
JAT
quik1987
Banned
- 7,735
- 434
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
What could have been.....
quik1987
Banned
- 7,735
- 434
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
What could have been.....
- 498
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2003
^^^ picture of potential instead of greatness. vince coulda been a top 20 of all time guy, basketball skill was there but everything else wasn't.
- 498
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2003
^^^ picture of potential instead of greatness. vince coulda been a top 20 of all time guy, basketball skill was there but everything else wasn't.
- 44,202
- 2,534
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2006
Vinsanity was sick
- 44,202
- 2,534
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2006
Vinsanity was sick
- 5,140
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2005
A young VC was the single nastiest dude to ever step on an NBA court.
Who else throws down 360's in traffic? Catches fully extended windmill alley oops in a game? Puts it off the farside of the backboard and then goes and puts it back with a dunk?
JUMPS OVER PEOPLE?
Plus the Shox VC 2 is the greatest shoe of all time.
Who else throws down 360's in traffic? Catches fully extended windmill alley oops in a game? Puts it off the farside of the backboard and then goes and puts it back with a dunk?
JUMPS OVER PEOPLE?
Plus the Shox VC 2 is the greatest shoe of all time.
- 5,140
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2005
A young VC was the single nastiest dude to ever step on an NBA court.
Who else throws down 360's in traffic? Catches fully extended windmill alley oops in a game? Puts it off the farside of the backboard and then goes and puts it back with a dunk?
JUMPS OVER PEOPLE?
Plus the Shox VC 2 is the greatest shoe of all time.
Who else throws down 360's in traffic? Catches fully extended windmill alley oops in a game? Puts it off the farside of the backboard and then goes and puts it back with a dunk?
JUMPS OVER PEOPLE?
Plus the Shox VC 2 is the greatest shoe of all time.
- 1,256
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2004
"Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk. "
- 1,256
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2004
"Don't fake the funk on a nasty dunk. "
- 6,259
- 2,066
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- 6,259
- 2,066
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- 5,494
- 3,650
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
Originally Posted by quik1987
What could have been.....
- 5,494
- 3,650
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
Originally Posted by quik1987
What could have been.....
quik1987
Banned
- 7,735
- 434
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
^VC made it to the 2nd round the year TMAC was traded by himself. They were one shot from eastern conference finals, you don't think TMAC would have helped the Raptors? Furthermore if they were both on the same team they would have been able to play less minutes protecting them from injury.
quik1987
Banned
- 7,735
- 434
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
^VC made it to the 2nd round the year TMAC was traded by himself. They were one shot from eastern conference finals, you don't think TMAC would have helped the Raptors? Furthermore if they were both on the same team they would have been able to play less minutes protecting them from injury.
- 5,494
- 3,650
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
I kinda of think they would have ended up worst than westbrook and durant, both of them would have tried to steal each others shine. I think they went that far that year because TMAC wasnt there, TMAC got alot of game but no heart.
- 5,494
- 3,650
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2006
I kinda of think they would have ended up worst than westbrook and durant, both of them would have tried to steal each others shine. I think they went that far that year because TMAC wasnt there, TMAC got alot of game but no heart.
- 1,256
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2004
Both of them are ball dominant players, and neither plays great enough defense. It is the skills of Michael and Scottie, all the style but none of the substance unfortunately. Individually, each could shine because they could show off their awesome, unstoppable offensive arsenal. With each other they wouldn't of been able to really shine and neither was capable at that time of understanding how to do the other things that go into winning.
- 1,256
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2004
Both of them are ball dominant players, and neither plays great enough defense. It is the skills of Michael and Scottie, all the style but none of the substance unfortunately. Individually, each could shine because they could show off their awesome, unstoppable offensive arsenal. With each other they wouldn't of been able to really shine and neither was capable at that time of understanding how to do the other things that go into winning.
