Clyde Frog
formerly jay02
- Jan 8, 2011
- 12,617
- 7,475
Think of all the things that tick you off about cable TV. Along with brainless programming and crummy customer service, the very worst aspect of it is forced bundling. You can't pay just for the couple of dozen channels you actually watch. Instead, you have to pay for a couple of hundred channels, because the good stuff is scattered among a number of overstuffed packages.
Now, imagine that the Internet worked that way. You'd hate it, of course. But that's the direction that Verizon, with the support of many wired and wireless carriers, would like to push the Web. That's not hypothetical. The country's No. 1 carrier is fighting in court to end the Federal Communications Commission's policy of Net neutrality, a move that would open the gates to a whole new -- and wholly bad -- economic model on the Web.
As it stands now, you pay your Internet service provider and go wherever you want on the Web. Packets of bits are just packets and have to be treated equally. That's the essence of Net neutrality. But Verizon's plan, which the company has outlined during hearings in federal court and before Congress, would change that. Verizon and its allies would like to charge websites that carry popular content for the privilege of moving their packets to your connected device. Again, that's not hypothetical.
ESPN, for example, is in negotiations with at least one major cellular carrier to pay to exempt its content from subscribers' cellular data caps. And what's wrong with that? Well, ESPN is big and rich and can pay for that exemption, but other content providers -- think of your local jazz station that streams audio -- couldn't afford it and would be out of business. Or, they'd make you pay to visit their websites. Indeed, if that system had been in place 10 years ago, fledglings like Google or YouTube or Facebook might never have gotten out of the nest.
http://www.infoworld.com/d/the-indu...al-plan-turn-the-web-pay-view-226662?page=0,0
Just in general how long do you think the Internet will remain wild and free (for the most part) like it is now? I think the younger generations aren't as involved as they should be when it comes to voting or excercising their rights and powers, but I think if there is anything that would give an incentive to do so, it would to be to protect the Internet. Not that older generations don't care about the Internet, but I think there's different priorities. I am confident that if there's anything we the people can all agree on and have the power to prevent, it's to stop anyone from changing the Internet for the sake of being a power trip (the government), or greed (these corporations). I mean we have the Internet itself as tool to use. I would also hope that the Googles and Facebooks stick to their roots and help.
I'm not really sure how likely it is or if Verizon has the power to start making these changes but the fact they're making an attempt irritates me enough to bring it up.
Last edited: