- 37,825
- 15,634
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
But this has been done before, no? Tiger and Sergio have been going back and forth for two weeks now. I'm tired of it, and it's an obvious (and poor) troll attempt by Sergio because he can't beat Tiger. How can you be so sure about my reaction?
Because you always fire at nomad
The arguing is tired between them but it obv took an ignorant turn yesterday. Sergio is going to regret it.
I do fire at him, I'm not the only one and I haven't even said the worst. So sue me. I'm more annoyed at the back and forth more so from Sergio's end. He's not as good as Tiger so this is the only way he can have his name mentioned in the same sentence as him .
I'm saying the story between these two is a non story at this point. Tiger is in the golf world, he is and has been aware of how he's viewed despite his great play. Let's not be naive here. The issue has been dealt with before, why are you trying to make an issue out of old ****? It's never acceptable, but at this point it's like whatever, you expect it. Vijay Singh is also racist, you wanna bring that up to? Give it a rest.
You sound stupid, and neglegent. What you're failing to realize is passive observation is what allows the self-entitled racist to survive in a progressive nation. The rich and elite are majority white, and even though each individual may not be racist themselves in order to survive financially there's certain levels of ignorance they're willing to except.
Silence is a power tool of negotiation because it can discredit the possibility of social change, which is the same reason the government doesn't doesn't address conspiracy accusations. The oldest trick in the book of conservatism.
What are you talking about? Stop trying to distract people with all that flowery nonsense. We know White people make up the majority of the elite in America and those that aren't racist and have that type of status don't defend those that are racist. Why? Because they don't want their money affected by trying to be the "politically correct guy". That premise happens on different scales cross racially and culturally, so let's not pretend that statement is so profound.
The reason why I said what I said initially is beause as others stated in here, it's not like Tiger talks about being Black in the world of golf and puts it on the forefront (nor should he have to, but think about his awareness versus a Bill Russell for example). He doesn't necessarily embrace that fact as he has shown in the past, so his response is what I expected. He had to say that he was "hurt" because he had no choice. I wouldn't have chosen those words, but I'm not Tiger Woods.