- Jul 10, 2015
- 33,525
- 27,224
He actually broke 2 players ankles! [emoji]128563[/emoji] pic.twitter.com/Me1ZFkMHZx
— Footy Vines (@FootyVines) February 8, 2017
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He actually broke 2 players ankles! [emoji]128563[/emoji] pic.twitter.com/Me1ZFkMHZx
— Footy Vines (@FootyVines) February 8, 2017
I'M BYKE
He stayed with the Mane didn't have to sexy himself up like Bale and Ramos
Modric's mane is so luxurious
False Zohan blessed him with the scissors
Goal line tech+review*
Like the NFL on scoring plays. Crazy thing is goals stop matches anyways so it wouldn't really disrupt the flow of the game that much to the point it isn't worth getting the call right if they take a page out of the NBA with the review center.
Modric's mane is so luxurious
If the New Jersey replay center for the NBA is any indication, it most definitely wouldn't delay the game only 30 seconds. That NBA replay system is FAIL. How come the vast majority of the time they have one of those situations in the NBA where they review the call, I, as a mere mortal at home, can see CLEARLY what the call should be when they show the replay, like without a shadow of a doubt, yet that "replay center" takes another minute or so to review it? Sometimes it's ridiculous how clear the call is, yet they still take another minute to make the call. As soon as a person at home can see what the call should be before it is actually called by the refs themselves, that's a FAIL. As if there aren't enough stops already in the NBA.Yup, easy, just have a replay/review center like the NBA has in NJ. It takes about 2 or 3 angles to at the most to determine if the player was on or off. You could already see that Griezmann was on in the first or second replay of the call. Would delay the game 30 seconds to a minute at most, usually the amount of time a player takes to celebrate and have the ball at midfield already.
Yup, easy, just have a replay/review center like the NBA has in NJ. It takes about 2 or 3 angles to at the most to determine if the player was on or off. You could already see that Griezmann was on in the first or second replay of the call. Would delay the game 30 seconds to a minute at most, usually the amount of time a player takes to celebrate and have the ball at midfield already.
If the New Jersey replay center for the NBA is any indication, it most definitely wouldn't delay the game only 30 seconds. That NBA replay system is FAIL. How come the vast majority of the time they have one of those situations in the NBA where they review the call, I, as a mere mortal at home, can see CLEARLY what the call should be when they show the replay, like without a shadow of a doubt, yet that "replay center" takes another minute or so to review it? Sometimes it's ridiculous how clear the call is, yet they still take another minute to make the call. As soon as a person at home can see what the call should be before it is actually called by the refs themselves, that's a FAIL. As if there aren't enough stops already in the NBA.
If they're going to implement any video reffing in football, it should be of a more live and immediate variety. Like have two refs watching huge 4K displays of the game from different angles, and if they see what the call should be, they report it right away to the earpiece of the main ref on the pitch. Also, I really hope that they one day make an offside technology so that the refs on the sidelines can focus on fouls and the "grey-area" calls that require human judgement instead of offside, which is a black-and-white call that could be determined via technology.
View media item 2286029Don't flatter yourself
I'd do the same thing if I came across Gunner charts
Spurs, Citeh and Chelsea are all doing their thing right now,not much ammo