- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,011
- 9,948
I'm not a fan of that shoe in general. Although the toebox has a lot of room in it. It's the best to ball in, in terms of what though?
dirtbags. Most of those that work in shoe stores are. It's even worse now. I was never really like that though.
Just a question of curiosity...
What are the footlocker workers at your footlocker like?
And...be quiet @franc
[thread="603301"]14s are fire plus they are probably the best of the official j's line to ball in.[/thread]
I can't speak on the latest retros, but older XIVs had amazing traction, court-feel, cushioning and great ankle support, without being overly restrictive. They were also very light when they came out, although like most leather shoes they're probably bricks by today's standards. The thing that made them so amazing was the fact they had an incredible amount of court-feel, while retaining great cushioning. XIVs were in a league of their own and are still considered by many to be the best performing Jordan on court. The only shoes of the period I can recall coming close to the traction/court-feel/cushioning combo of the XIVs are the Jet Flight and Flightposite II's, both of which released a few years after the XIV.
beh, what dank said.
dank knows