- Aug 10, 2012
- 27,960
- 47,548
The Official Nike Air Max 90 Thread
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by michigan,
- Start date
- Aug 10, 2012
- 27,960
- 47,548
- Jul 5, 2024
- 211
- 829
- Sep 5, 2000
- 4,542
- 11,154
In this thread? So long as they’re Air Max 90s, then yes, absolutely. I’d say about 97% of people who frequent this thread don’t give a damn about how limited a pair of 90s are. We just like the shoe.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 27,960
- 47,548
- Feb 21, 2010
- 7,027
- 38,993
- Nov 26, 2014
- 9,665
- 43,859
How do they fit? Heading to london tonight and may grab a pair if I see them.
- Feb 21, 2010
- 7,027
- 38,993
True to size, slightly on the snug side thanks to the materials. The mesh is kind of like this hemp type of material, and the mud guard has that denim type of textile - doesn’t have as much stretch as a general release pair of 90s.
These feel really comfortable under foot, more so than other recent GRs I’ve gotten in the past year or so. No idea if they added the forefoot air like they did on the 2020 releases, since these are a “premium” release, or if it’s just a comfy insole, or if my mind is just playing tricks on me.
Either way, not bad for being on sale on the Nike site right now. By the way, they come laced up with white laces and they include these oranges as a spare set
- Nov 26, 2014
- 9,665
- 43,859
Definitely thought that was the size? collab 
- Oct 9, 2005
- 2,965
- 11,345
Is it me or are the 2020 AM3s and recrafts more comfy than the 90s out now. I feel like that run of AM3s was not to far off from the vomero 5 comfort.
- Jul 20, 2012
- 6,933
- 14,455
Definitely more comfortable... Not sure about vomero level for me, but not bricks under feet like alot of the newer (and past) 90s.
- Feb 6, 2018
- 622
- 2,352
That's because the 2020 am3s have forefoot nike air
- Oct 9, 2005
- 2,965
- 11,345
I think I might circle back and get a few colorways I missed of the AM3's. Still need those spruce's!
- May 15, 2013
- 1,721
- 2,941
Today
- Jul 9, 2013
- 67
- 231
I know it's been discussed plenty of times, but it's crazy how Nike put out such a perfect shaped 90 with those 2020 releases, and went right back to the boot/bulky look. It's been some really good colorways but I can't do it cause of that ugly bulkiness they went back to.
- Aug 10, 2012
- 27,960
- 47,548
- Nov 26, 2014
- 9,665
- 43,859
This is the definition of “fire in hand”
- Feb 1, 2006
- 2,302
- 2,281
Clean design, really liked this one.
Hope it's just the angle, but to
ivwardthinking
point, that toe-box looking steep. Nike squandered a lot of good models the past 5+ years with some regressive shape issues
Hope it's just the angle, but to
ivwardthinking
point, that toe-box looking steep. Nike squandered a lot of good models the past 5+ years with some regressive shape issues
dblplay1212
Supporter
- May 23, 2016
- 21,558
- 42,320
Going away from mesh on Infrared is some bs. Thank God I have multiple left from 2020.
One of best retros in last decade too
- Feb 6, 2018
- 622
- 2,352
What are these?This is the definition of “fire in hand”
- Nov 26, 2014
- 9,665
- 43,859
size? 25th anniversary pair. that gbp to usd conversion is steep, though =( damnit, brexit.
Last edited:
- Dec 11, 2004
- 7,634
- 14,498
That whole shoe looks like just random bits and pieces slammed together, with the worst part that moon landing print which looks completely out of place.
A bit like badly executed Bespokes.
A bit like badly executed Bespokes.
- Sep 15, 2016
- 1,652
- 5,580
Copied from Side A
