- Dec 27, 2012
- 73,567
- 100,581
it's definitely the offseason
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The amount of probing Nash did, especially across the baseline, is definitely a skill that is widely used with ball-handlers of the modern era.I don’t hear anyone from this generation saying they modeled their game after Steve Nash
None of these guys ever acknowledge Nash
The amount of probing Nash did, especially across the baseline, is definitely a skill that is widely used with ball-handlers of the modern era.
Now whether or not the players are aware Nash is the reason for it doesn't make him not the reason for it.
So I would say that is at least one thing Nash has inspired others to do.
If only Kwame didn't have hands like a toddler, Nash would be rightfully excoriated for the overrated player he really was.
They played small ball but still had a number of 6’10”+ guys. They had Shaq and Shawn Marks. Even though off the bench.
This notion that PHX only had guys 6’8” and under is false. They had a number of bench players in the 6’10”, 6’11” range
Destroyed. Every time.
I don’t hear anyone from this generation saying they modeled their game after Steve Nash
None of these guys ever acknowledge Nash
You guys are blinded by the fact that D’Antoni ran that uptempo, 3s over 2s offense.
Strip allllll that away Nash is still slightly above average.
Tons of PGs average 15 and 10
I won’t even mention how he rode the bench his first 4 seasons.
He was an excellent shooter.
Again, dude averaged 14-8…..
Meanwhile J-Kidd averaged 12-8 and Nash was soooooooo much better
J-Kidd was the one he was traded for the first time. Nash then goes back to PHX, and Kidd wins with Dirk
‘20 Lakers. Enough said.In general I’ve never seen this much hate for a team that has won a championship. It’s like people couldn’t even process that they were gonna win
J Kidd's teams produced offenses ranked in the 20's.
Nash's teams produced THE MOST EFFICIENT OFFENSE IN THE HISOTRY OF BASKETBALL for like 4 years straight,
If it really is so easy, and all you need is 15 and 10, you need to explain the insane offensive performance of the suns. regardless of the cast, teammates with Amare, no Amare.
Why did it produce historic offensive results?
Hes going to say it was all Dantoni but those Knicks teams had a top 10 offense once in his tenure there.J Kidd's teams produced offenses ranked in the 20's.
Nash's teams produced THE MOST EFFICIENT OFFENSE IN THE HISOTRY OF BASKETBALL for like 4 years straight,
If it really is so easy, and all you need is 15 and 10, you need to explain the insane offensive performance of the suns. regardless of the cast, teammates with Amare, no Amare.
Why did it produce historic offensive results?
Do you at least feel Nash was worthy of being a First Ballot HOFer? finessence
Since I heard you say he was slightly above average.
PHX was the ONLY team shooting volume 3s. That’s why
Look at them compared to the modern NBA now
They’ve always got credit for doing it first
Hes going to say it was all Dantoni but those Knicks teams had a top 10 offense once in his tenure there.
ADVERTISEMENTOf course.
This isn’t about his hall candidacy though
It’s just amazing how much criticism John Stockton gets, when he and Nash are the same player
The same player as far as? Explain.Of course.
This isn’t about his hall candidacy though
It’s just amazing how much criticism John Stockton gets, when he and Nash are the same player
Do you watch games or do you just peruse the boxscore?
They aren't the same player at all.