- Dec 2, 2013
- 53
- 16
I agree with your first sentence to an extent--yes there's likely a considerable possibility that those who join would only join provided they're the ones striking out every Saturday morning. I think that would be a kind of risk necessary to take. I also think however that so long as people feel they're part of something (in just the same way people think they're part of a larger collective--sneakerheads for instance), they might be willing to hold out for more than you think.
There are waaaay too many followers to start any sort of movement the same guy that co-signs what your saying will be the same one to take your spot in a raffle or rsvp spot.
Nike isnt interested in what sneakerheads opinion is on quality, supply numbers, and price is cuz they know you will line anyway.
Nike is a company just like some the examples you mentioned but the difference in the two is the market BOA customers avg age 45.. Nike customer base avg age 15... They throw some GITD or 3M everyone is happy
I salute your thinking... Repped
Of course Nike doesn't care about us, so long as we're not doing something--but imagine if a thread were created on Niketalk, and the members of that thread committed to not purchase anything from Nike. Imagine that Sneakernews and other websites picked up on it. You don't think Nike would begin to take notice--if only for the sake of their publicity? If we stopped paying resellers, you don't think resellers would stop buying the sneakers in the first place?
I admit there is a problem with the fact that so many customers are so young, and wouldn't likely be interested in this at all. I'm not sure that's really a deterrent though. These things have to begin somewhere--and the people who are a part of them have to realize it takes more than a weekend.