- 15,859
- 3,481
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2006
Wow black museum
Doctor went way too hard lol
I see what you did there
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Wow black museum
Doctor went way too hard lol
At the beginning of Arkangel when the doctors take the baby away after birth and the mom panics...is there supposed to be something integral to the story happening here?
What's wild is she wasn't even the driver. The gerbil angle was terrible though, they could've done better.
Bro, swear I kept thinking the same thing. Especially when he started sweating.I thought Black Museum was gonna be on some Tales From the Hood **** and dude was going to reveal he was some sort of digital demon at the end
i think it was to show she never got over that fear she felt in that moment
LiveScience.com on 'Why Do Medical Researchers Use Mice' said:As a minimum requirement, mice used in experiments must be of the same purebred species. Another reason rodents are used as models in medical testing is that their genetic, biological and behavior characteristics closely resemble those of humans, and many symptoms of human conditions can be replicated in mice and rats.Nov 16, 2010
This is a pretty good deduction.Someguy on Reddit on why Metalhead was in BW said:I thought it was in black and white because it's a dog's world.
I think the main issue is because we cant readily think of a method to do that without certain stimuli. But, as said before the memory device was most likely developed using lab rodents during the tuning process to ready for human trials, much like with physical sensation transmitter from tale 1 of Black Museum. If that's the case then one can assume a set of rules or steps can be taken to jog rodent memory. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but some rodent brains and the human brain are very much alike.
if you have to go through this much guesswork, could it really have been a good story? sometimes having to fill in the some of the blanks is cool & granted anything sci-fi prolly takes a lil bit of willing suspension of disbelief...but the more i think about that episode the less any of it makes sense...
in world where such a technology could exist who thinks they're just going to be able to murk MULTIPLE PEOPLE and get away with it? maybe the 1st one, which it still didn't makes sense to kill dude, but at least she wasn't aware of the tech then, but after seeing there is this tech that can visually pull & recreate memories from people's heads she offs 3 MORE people...had that episode begun with her behind the wheel and wanting to ditch the body, at least the precedent that she was a selfish psycho, who already caught a body, might have been set rather than what took place, her killing a dude for something she didn't even do? she could said told him to leave her out of it, said she was white-girl wasted passed out in the back seat, or even just waited for dude to get out of his feelings; nah, nah he gotsta die, #snitchesgetdead i guess she had a code...
No, I don't with the reasoning and data supporting it. How is it guesswork? Just because they don't explicitly say how its done doesn't make it not plausible. Rodent brains carry a large similarity to human brains AND we already know they use rodents for testing and trials for many products. This shouldn't be different, no? There is enough peripheral info on a basic & intermediate level, to assume this a plausible scenario for technology application.
I thought this episode was solid. Just the worst of the season. I also think it's better than a couple episodes from BM past.
1. I think she was aware of the tech, but by killing him while they are alone it means nothing comes back to her. Atleast that's her hope.
NOTE: Many say find disbelief in how she killed her ex. Which I also think is plausible in how they showed it to happen.
2. If you start the episode with her clearly being a psycho, doesn't it lose meaning? The episode's main purpose was to show a previous mistake she went along with and helped with, although begrudgingly. She moves on to establish a very good life for herself only to have that previous event rear its head because her ex had been 'enlightened' and found his way. If he gets indicted in anyway, she goes with him for aiding. Even if he doesn't give her up, he's basically turning himself in and they are most definitely going to use 'memory recaller' on a suspect to see the events that took place. If you had help doing wrong, everyone is going with you in this reality. There's no way around that.
3. She cant say she's passed out, with the 'memory recaller' tech present. She'd have to have Jedi level mind skills to change her memory of something.
Yeah, the show is British, but allows for others to have creative control over individual episodes.
From what I've been reading, during s3 is when they/the creator became more open to all types of writers scripting an episode. Also when they started casting more American actors.the creator is definitely british & still has some level of creative control over it, but the individual episodes may be written and/or directed other individuals who may (not) be british...i believe it is still made to air 1st in britain tho
1. Ah, yes you are dead right. But doesn't that little tid bit kind of justify the rest of her action. Kills 1 guy, thinks she covered it pretty well...which she did. Lady shows up asking about a completely unrelated thing, using the recaller and BOOM she knows about the murder. So do you just let her live and hope she says nothing?
2. It think it does. Only because the grand scheme of why she's going though so much to cover up may get lost IMO. It's important to...
A. show the original accident first and her regret and disapproval of what was happening
&
B. her new very successful and happy life
....both of those images shape who she is. She's not a cold killer at heart at all, she's just willing to anything to keep her happy life.
3. Again you are right as she didn't know at that point. His entire plan of action was to confront the widower of the man he killed, whom he already researched, and come clean to wipe away the sin of his life. The backlash of it is the widower most likely telling, wanting Justice and she(the antagonist/protagonist) still has a very real chance of getting caught in his wind. He was the driver, it was all on him. But, she helped and that is enough to bring her in with the recaller.
If you think about White Bear, it shows some similarity there. Assuming Victoria didn't want to kill the little girl and was forced by her S/O to film (News report said that was her take during the 'Big Reveal', she still had to endure a criminally unfair punishment because of being involved.
She isn't a mass murder at heart. It's not her thing at all. You can tell in each of those killings it was breaking her. I pretty sure she cried DURING each. She's not cold. She's doing what she thought she had to to maintain.
From what I've been reading, during s3 is when theyŷthe creator became more open to all types of writers scripting an episode. Also when they started casting more American actors.
the white bear thing is a really good point...still, there really isn’t a reason (at that point, anyway) for her to think her involvement would have to be known to the point she would have to decide to murk dude in that moment, placing further jeopardy on her life/freedom...she may not be one at heart, but to off that many people doesn’t seem proportional, and again in a world where such a tech is possible...who would think they could get away with even one murder, much less 4...
i also hate the idea that all these stories take place in the same universe
Why did she even need to go upstairs in crocodile? Could've just bounced after she offed the husband.