- Dec 12, 2015
- 365
- 1,696
The mudguard wrinkles give the currys a vintage vibe reminiscent of these early 80's runners
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nah on foot the wrinkles disappearI would def return those! No reason we should be paying 150 plus tax on am1 to have them looking like that!!
Nike had messed up my initial order, CS applied a discount when they re-sent.Where can those be purchased for under retail?
This last one yeah, 8+ though.nonheinous is that iphoneX? Portrait mode?
Put the BTSN pair in the Nike box and send back to Nike for free.
Nike pair on the right, bstn on the left! Bstn sending back action (but i have to pay the shipping cost smh)
Nike pair is on top , the two shoe have the same quality/crafment...
Bstn pair have dem hairy suede, curry marks on the mesh and the laces, the left shoe have that healthy mudguard but the right didn’t eat enough hahaha...
Copped the nike pair with discount so its not the same amount of money to have backPut the BTSN pair in the Nike box and send back to Nike for free.
Size? preview show that they release on 27thThat atmos airmax pack is lowkey flying under radar...
It's cheap massed produced sneakers. They aren't museum masterpieces to go over with a magnifying glass. Learn to deal with it or stop buying cheap sneakers.
You think it’s coming from the new population of wearers to the AM1 introduced by this curry pack only recently?
Oh wow wasn’t asking directly to you just opened ended like you had asked as well.i was just thinking aloud. i have no clue. i think the popularity/hype of the SW97/1 and its vintage feel aligns with the look/feel of the curry's.
Cheap may not be the best word to use but they aren't $500 A.P.C. either.Cheap to produce, not cheap to buy! That's probably what irks people the most.
Cue Alonzo gif.But $40 Vans and Chucks have better QC than these $150 Nikes. It's a shame.