- 685
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2005
the mustangs stats are wrong
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by GorgeousGangsta
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Isnt a BMW a poor mans Mercedes
BMW is a drivers car. you buy a Mercedes when you want to be DRIVEN, you buy a BMW when you want to DRIVE
Originally Posted by GorgeousGangsta
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Isnt a BMW a poor mans Mercedes
BMW is a drivers car. you buy a Mercedes when you want to be DRIVEN, you buy a BMW when you want to DRIVE
or an SLR or many other modelsOriginally Posted by Baller23217
Originally Posted by GorgeousGangsta
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Isnt a BMW a poor mans Mercedes
BMW is a drivers car. you buy a Mercedes when you want to be DRIVEN, you buy a BMW when you want to DRIVE
no one gettin driven around in a C63 amg
40% of Asians stay in CaliOriginally Posted by treewing
I see em all the time in L.A.
Originally Posted by Kicktionair
Originally Posted by KenJi714
Again. Only old ignorant patriotic American would drop 150k for a 1960s Mustang trying to relive their Woodstock dayOriginally Posted by LetItShine24
Originally Posted by KenJi714
m3 = instant class
mustang = ugly , cheap americans gas drinker
did you forget about "classic" american cars buddy? theres mustangs from the 60's that go for than 150k. NO ONE is going to remember an m3. i see early 90 mustangs that go more than 2005 m3s. typical euro jocker.. Everyone know deep down the Mustang is a piece of junk metal. Any young modern car buyers would go for the M3. Come on man it's a BMW . BMW = status and $$$. You like the classic American look, hey go for it old man but you know American cars are crap.
Euro > American any days it's not even fair for GM
Dudes just talking out the %%## now.........
'Come on man it's a BMW'
Don't assume. You know what they say about people who assume.Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Originally Posted by Anthony Stark
Am I the only one who likes the older M3's more than the new ones?
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Since we are talking stupid what if the mustang could fly and ahd a jet engine in it?
Bringing up the old what if the M3 was 30K less. C'mon lets talk real not what ifs.Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Since we are talking stupid what if the mustang could fly and ahd a jet engine in it?
Talking stupid? How?
For someone who money is no object to which car do you think they'd choose? Answer me that.
Originally Posted by KenJi714
Again. Only old ignorant patriotic American would drop 150k for a 1960s Mustang trying to relive their Woodstock dayOriginally Posted by LetItShine24
Originally Posted by KenJi714
m3 = instant class
mustang = ugly , cheap americans gas drinker
did you forget about "classic" american cars buddy? theres mustangs from the 60's that go for than 150k. NO ONE is going to remember an m3. i see early 90 mustangs that go more than 2005 m3s. typical euro jocker.. Everyone know deep down the Mustang is a piece of junk metal. Any young modern car buyers would go for the M3. Come on man it's a BMW . BMW = status and $$$. You like the classic American look, hey go for it old man but you know American cars are crap.
Euro > American any days it's not even fair for GM
Originally Posted by KenJi714
Again. Only old ignorant patriotic American would drop 150k for a 1960s Mustang trying to relive their Woodstock dayOriginally Posted by LetItShine24
Originally Posted by KenJi714
m3 = instant class
mustang = ugly , cheap americans gas drinker
did you forget about "classic" american cars buddy? theres mustangs from the 60's that go for than 150k. NO ONE is going to remember an m3. i see early 90 mustangs that go more than 2005 m3s. typical euro jocker.. Everyone know deep down the Mustang is a piece of junk metal. Any young modern car buyers would go for the M3. Come on man it's a BMW . BMW = status and $$$. You like the classic American look, hey go for it old man but you know American cars are crap.
Euro > American any days it's not even fair for GM
Uhhhh, whichever one they liked more.Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Since we are talking stupid what if the mustang could fly and ahd a jet engine in it?
Talking stupid? How?
For someone who money is no object to which car do you think they'd choose? Answer me that.
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Since we are talking stupid what if the mustang could fly and ahd a jet engine in it?
Talking stupid? How?
For someone who money is no object to which car do you think they'd choose? Answer me that.
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Bringing up the old what if the M3 was 30K less. C'mon lets talk real not what ifs.Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Since we are talking stupid what if the mustang could fly and ahd a jet engine in it?
Talking stupid? How?
For someone who money is no object to which car do you think they'd choose? Answer me that.
If money was no object they wouldnt buy either and would get a Mercedes, Aston Martin, ect.
It's not a what if....you're avoiding the question. Take some random Billionaire who can have the choice of the GT or the M3 and they perform the same....which is he gonna pick? The M3. Don't play dumb and try to change the subject now. We're talking about these specific two cars.Originally Posted by Baltimore
Bringing up the old what if the M3 was 30K less. C'mon lets talk real not what ifs.Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
Originally Posted by Baltimore
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
Since we are talking stupid what if the mustang could fly and ahd a jet engine in it?
Talking stupid? How?
For someone who money is no object to which car do you think they'd choose? Answer me that.
If money was no object they wouldnt buy either and would get a Mercedes, Aston Martin, ect.
Originally Posted by Fear The Ibis
I find it ironic that on a message board where a lot of y'all buy overpriced and expensive Jordan's and Nike's you all are trying to argue that the Mustang is just better because they have the same performance and it costs less.
Meanwhile you all are dropping 200+ on pairs of shoes that don't perform that much better than some 40$ ones from payless.
Everything isn't that black and white. It's not all about money. A BMW is more prestigious than a Ford plain and simple and it has nothing to do with performance or luxury. It's the name....
Question....if they were the same price and had the exact same performance......which one would 99% of you chose? The M3 easily. And why???? Because it's a BMW M3 that's way.
M3 > Mustang GT. I'm willing to bet most of you can't even afford the GT much less the M3. And someone who could afford an M3 wouldn't choose the GT instead just because it's a better value. It's a freaking M3. Which a lot of people consider one of the best all-around cars in the world for its price.
M3 are like Civics out here in LA, they are everywhere. NY takes another L.Originally Posted by ninjahood
http://www.youtube.com/v/zPSxdQqu_PM&hl=en_US&fs=1&http://www.youtube.com/v/zPSxdQqu_PM&hl=en_US&fs=1&
NT is full of it....you telling me you're gonna spend 30k MORE to get da M3 after u sat in this for 10 mins? pssh..meanwhile you NEVER see M anything on da streets
everyone's always pushing leased 325's.....
for what da M3 is going for you can get da brand new 2011 GT and a used SRT8 ANYTHING.