- 9,995
- 3,286
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2015
Exactly, its all about standing reach not height, that's why both jabari parker and Wiggins have the length to play the 4. Both have 8'11 standing reach
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Henson is/was much better than Skal.Is Skal just John Henson with a J?
Henson is/was much better than Skal.Is Skal just John Henson with a J?
I think that applies for pretty much the whole season. Only game in which I can remember him having an actual impact was the last game of the season against LSU. This Kentucky team is pretty much void of quality bigs, and he couldn't even get actual playing time for the majority of the year...Posting stats is just lazy and doesn't tell the entire story. There are periods in the game in many games this year where he looked like he didn't belong out there.
Skal is behind the development curve, which is alarming considering he'll turn 20 in 10 days.
But his pedigree might be too difficult to pass up.
I wanted to say that, but it may have been too harsh. How bad is he where he couldn't sniff real playing time on a team devoid of real big men?I think that applies for pretty much the whole season. Only game in which I can remember him having an actual impact was the last game of the season against LSU. This Kentucky team is pretty much void of quality bigs, and he couldn't even get actual playing time for the majority of the year...
This is pretty much how I feel. Obviously he'll develop once he's with NBA trainers like OKB said, but I really don't think he'll be able to contribute at the next level during his first contract. And that's a bit worrisome TO ME, especially if I take him in the lottery.Exactly. He's hinting at something right now after a ghastly few months to start the season. I just don't know if it's false hope yet or something he'll eventually be able to turn into a full skillset when he reaches age 25. Right now I'd probably burn a first-round pick on him anywhere after 17-18. That's without seeing him in the tournament and conference tournament against higher-profile and better quality bigs in consecutive games, which we'll see him up against very soon here. That'll tip my opinion either way re: trending up/down from 17-18.
My guess is he might be a decent player at some point in his NBA career but never the player people were hyping to start. But we'll see.
I wanted to say that, but it may have been too harsh. How bad is he where he couldn't sniff real playing time on a team devoid of real big men?
Skal's work before college got and kept his name in the lottery conversation. He's not a first round pick. I understand his family situation is dire, but when you've been poor that long is another year of development too much to ask? Look at what happened with Cliff Alexander. He was someone who needed more tutelage at the college level, but money grubbing relatives all but ruined what NBA potential he had.
He was getting bullied by college sized big men, most notably against Louisville. He fares a better chance against grown *** men in the NBA?