"The Last Dance" Michael Jordan & Chicago Bulls Docuseries

*Jordan...........

Why do we always do this as if he did it alone?
Cuz he was the leader and the best player on the team. Ppl who say this aren't ignoring Pippen, Kukoc, Rodman, Kerr, Harper, etc. on purpose. They're just crediting the best player who more times than was critical to most victories.

Ppl talk this way about a lot of superstar players. Iverson didn't do it alone, neither did Kobe or Shaw but those main guys tend to get credit 1st, same way they tend to get blamed first even though they didn't lose the game on their own.

Also there is something to it when you consider that one season Jordan wasn't in the league and the Bulls only made it to the ECF and lost to one of their main rivals in the Knicks.

Or maybe a young basketball player trying to earn his stripes doing things the right way. I swear you guys can turn anything into a negative for sport. Those players on that team in 85 were bums. Period.
Dry snitching is not the right way to do anything.

Nobody is critical of Mike cuz he didn't participate, its his shameless recounting of events. I bet if he was angry about losing he'd name names. Also the entire story is a vehicle to make him look good for not doing illegal drugs but we all know he ****** his fair share of women and us damn near an alcoholic.
 
Last edited:
Cuz he was the leader and the best player on the team. Ppl who say this aren't ignoring Pippen, Kukoc, Rodman, Kerr, Harper, etc. on purpose. They're just crediting the best player who more times than was critical to most victories.

Ppl talk this way about a lot of superstar players. Iverson didn't do it alone, neither did Kobe or Shaw but those main guys tend to get credit 1st, same way they tend to get blamed first even though they didn't lose the game on their own.

Also there is something to it when you consider that one season Jordan wasn't in the league and the Bulls only made it to the ECF and lost to one of their main rivals in the Knicks.
It was a semi-rhetorical of a question. I know people do IT. I have just always questioned it considering basketball is a team sport. We sometimes talk as if it is Tennis or something when we say, "PLayer X beat _____ (team/players/etc.) Just never liked it.


Also, him dry snitching should not have been done. Not sure why that is being defended.
 
who couldnt get it done without pippen
even he admitted it in the doc
Luckily for Mike, in his prime when the team was a contender he never had to step on the court without Pippen. So even him admitting that is just a hypothetical. So we don't know for a fact how Jordan do without Pippen.

Meanwhile, we saw how Pippen faired without Mike.
 
Luckily for Mike, in his prime when the team was a contender he never had to step on the court without Pippen. So even him admitting that is just a hypothetical. So we don't know for a fact how Jordan do without Pippen.

Meanwhile, we saw how Pippen faired without Mike.
pippen went farther without mike in the playoffs
than mike without pippen
or am i mistaken
8o 8o 8o
 
You in here for all the wrong reasons. But what I have learned here on NT is you cant defend the negative without getting "reported". Or warned. I would not waste my time spreading bs in a thread just for fun.. But hey, you do you right? I guess doing some coke in your profession is acceptable. The coke room story is 30 years old. Who cares? I knew that story when I was 11. Those players in the room? They had great careers didnt they? Dry snitching or not, no one cares about those guys that were in that room. It would have been one thing if he snitched in 85. But now comes the part where you say, how do you know he didnt.
 
I just feel like he shouldn't have told that story initially and he damn sure shouldn't have told it again.

We all have different codes though.
 
Y’all expect Jordan to be moving by street ***** codes out here :lol:
Jordan was super square, he walked in that room on them boys like
4C2854C9-095A-4D92-90C4-4E5F77483291.gif
 
pippen went farther without mike in the playoffs
than mike without pippen
or am i mistaken
:nerd: :nerd: :nerd:
You talking about before Mike was in his prime and he was dragging that trash Bulls team without Phil or Pip to the playoffs.

I know exactly why I worded my post the way I did.
 
You talking about before Mike was in his prime and he was dragging that trash Bulls team without Phil or Pip to the playoffs.

I know exactly why I worded my post the way I did.
and i know exactly why i posted what i said
to win a debate on technicalities
 
Back
Top Bottom