- May 13, 2013
- 2,720
- 2,275
Yes, and a lot of people have changed opinions on the argument in that time period. when he’s done playing is what I should have saidThats what people said 5-10 years ago.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, and a lot of people have changed opinions on the argument in that time period. when he’s done playing is what I should have saidThats what people said 5-10 years ago.
*Jordan...........look at how many HOF'ers Jordan denied a 'chip to.....
i know THATY'all ****** really don't know who MJ is as a person
Fam will **** on you for any reason.
tell em*Jordan...........
Why do we always do this as if he did it alone?
**** like that not surprising.i know THAT
but i didnt know bout that coke room story
that wholesome thing was an act**** like that not surprising.
Back then still with that accent he's taking on the wholesome good boy role. Team was a loser. No surprise he dry snitching on vets doing extracurriculars in the hotel.
Or maybe a young basketball player trying to earn his stripes doing things the right way. I swear you guys can turn anything into a negative for sport. Those players on that team in 85 were bums. Period.that wholesome thing was an act
snake to the fullest
Cuz he was the leader and the best player on the team. Ppl who say this aren't ignoring Pippen, Kukoc, Rodman, Kerr, Harper, etc. on purpose. They're just crediting the best player who more times than was critical to most victories.*Jordan...........
Why do we always do this as if he did it alone?
Dry snitching is not the right way to do anything.Or maybe a young basketball player trying to earn his stripes doing things the right way. I swear you guys can turn anything into a negative for sport. Those players on that team in 85 were bums. Period.
okOr maybe a young basketball player trying to earn his stripes doing things the right way. I swear you guys can turn anything into a negative for sport. Those players on that team in 85 were bums. Period.
who couldnt get it done without pippenCuz he was the leader and the best player on the team.
It was a semi-rhetorical of a question. I know people do IT. I have just always questioned it considering basketball is a team sport. We sometimes talk as if it is Tennis or something when we say, "PLayer X beat _____ (team/players/etc.) Just never liked it.Cuz he was the leader and the best player on the team. Ppl who say this aren't ignoring Pippen, Kukoc, Rodman, Kerr, Harper, etc. on purpose. They're just crediting the best player who more times than was critical to most victories.
Ppl talk this way about a lot of superstar players. Iverson didn't do it alone, neither did Kobe or Shaw but those main guys tend to get credit 1st, same way they tend to get blamed first even though they didn't lose the game on their own.
Also there is something to it when you consider that one season Jordan wasn't in the league and the Bulls only made it to the ECF and lost to one of their main rivals in the Knicks.
Luckily for Mike, in his prime when the team was a contender he never had to step on the court without Pippen. So even him admitting that is just a hypothetical. So we don't know for a fact how Jordan do without Pippen.who couldnt get it done without pippen
even he admitted it in the doc
pippen went farther without mike in the playoffsLuckily for Mike, in his prime when the team was a contender he never had to step on the court without Pippen. So even him admitting that is just a hypothetical. So we don't know for a fact how Jordan do without Pippen.
Meanwhile, we saw how Pippen faired without Mike.
You in here for all the wrong reasons. But what I have learned here on NT is you cant defend the negative without getting "reported". Or warned. I would not waste my time spreading bs in a thread just for fun.. But hey, you do you right? I guess doing some coke in your profession is acceptable. The coke room story is 30 years old. Who cares? I knew that story when I was 11. Those players in the room? They had great careers didnt they? Dry snitching or not, no one cares about those guys that were in that room. It would have been one thing if he snitched in 85. But now comes the part where you say, how do you know he didnt.
Pip had a better quality team than J did in those years.pippen went farther without mike in the playoffs
than mike without pippen
or am i mistaken
u defending jordan dry snitchingBut what I have learned here on NT is you cant defend the negative without getting "reported". Or warned.
that wasnt the debate i was having thoughPip had a better quality team than J did in those years.
Im sure it does. But you sure as hell have nothing quality to come back with, do ya?u defending jordan dry snitching
then posting this
his having me
no i did have a comebackIm sure it does. But you sure as hell have nothing quality to come back with, do ya?
You talking about before Mike was in his prime and he was dragging that trash Bulls team without Phil or Pip to the playoffs.pippen went farther without mike in the playoffs
than mike without pippen
or am i mistaken
and i know exactly why i posted what i saidYou talking about before Mike was in his prime and he was dragging that trash Bulls team without Phil or Pip to the playoffs.
I know exactly why I worded my post the way I did.