- 1,359
- 10
- Joined
- May 25, 2008
Also another thing. im starting to think that last year when the front office traded Big Z off the cavs, had something to do with why lebron insisted on bringing Z to the Heat
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Too bad 9 out of 10 times it's NOT legit.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
guys stop talking about lebron. even legit criticism that has a point to it is frowned upon.
leave lebron alone guys.
Too bad 9 out of 10 times it's NOT legit.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
guys stop talking about lebron. even legit criticism that has a point to it is frowned upon.
leave lebron alone guys.
Originally Posted by OneTrust
Too bad 9 out of 10 times it's NOT legit.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
guys stop talking about lebron. even legit criticism that has a point to it is frowned upon.
leave lebron alone guys.
It's fans of other players spewing nonsense getting mad that Lebron went to play with REAL NBA all stars for ONCE in his career and might actually have a real chance of winning in the future.
Originally Posted by OneTrust
Too bad 9 out of 10 times it's NOT legit.Originally Posted by Cedric Ceballos 1995 Lakers
guys stop talking about lebron. even legit criticism that has a point to it is frowned upon.
leave lebron alone guys.
It's fans of other players spewing nonsense getting mad that Lebron went to play with REAL NBA all stars for ONCE in his career and might actually have a real chance of winning in the future.
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
Originally Posted by LongRange3Ball
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"I still don't see the argument of how the Cavs didn't have the pieces for a championship."
They didn't always play great team defense and "reliable" 2nd option Mo Williams played like garbage. And his defense would make Steve Nash look like Bill Russell.
Simple.
So what about those seasons of 60+ wins? They were just lucky? You don't win 60+ wins and "not be a championship contender."
<
Are you stupid? Outside of LBJ and Andy, the team didn't do that IN THE PLAYOFFS.
Are you truly this stupid? It isn't hard to understand. Reg season performance =/= playoff performance.
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
Originally Posted by LongRange3Ball
Originally Posted by LuketheJediKnight
"I still don't see the argument of how the Cavs didn't have the pieces for a championship."
They didn't always play great team defense and "reliable" 2nd option Mo Williams played like garbage. And his defense would make Steve Nash look like Bill Russell.
Simple.
So what about those seasons of 60+ wins? They were just lucky? You don't win 60+ wins and "not be a championship contender."
<
Are you stupid? Outside of LBJ and Andy, the team didn't do that IN THE PLAYOFFS.
Are you truly this stupid? It isn't hard to understand. Reg season performance =/= playoff performance.