- 22,094
- 9,980
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2013
yea these contracts are getting better for everybody. good for them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
PreciselyI mean, Brandon Knight got 70 million. Jackson getting 80 million isn't that surprisingI don't particularly care for Reggie, and I'm surely thankful he isn't in OKC anymore, but my dislike isn't going to prompt me to think he deserved a 4/43 contract that he turned down, I expected him to get what he got, or something similar, he expected to get what he got, we all (minus a few folks) knew it was coming, and can see how and or why.
If it's a question of deserving, that's a cloudy one. If it's a question of whether or not they were going to get big deals, there should have been none
qft
i care about everyone in this thread
this should be the mantra of the thread
that or ELE
In the words of Rick James (sort of) "They should of never gave this ***** money"
Yea, that gamble sounds like this....
Boss: You're going to work more hours and be in a leadership role
Employee: cool, I'm ready.
Boss: You go from $7 to $8
Employee: Nah, I think this role pays $15
Boss: You're right. How about $15 per hour then.
Employee: Sounds Great
What a gamble
Reggie was getting paid, the end.
Done.
He gambled, he won.
You win, too. Cool?
I gambled by challenging you, I lost.
I know I lost, Fontaine FTW
Everybody knew Reggie was getting paid, except those who don't watch ball
Just because someone offers you x and you take twice X in the end because you know it's the fair amount, doesn't mean you gambled.
More like you got the fair amount.
I can sell my truck and just because I pass a low baller and agree with a fair buyer, doesn't mean I gambled and won.
It means I got fair market value for my Truck.
In that respect, every player who doesn't sign an extension is gambling. Every player who signs a one year deal is gambling. These are givens bruh.
Reggie getting more money was a given, if he remained healthy.
We all know being healthy is a part of the game.
If this is the gamble you are now resorting to then, you win again.
Every time a player signs a new deal, I'm going to be like, "they gambled and won", and I will be right, right?
I told you Reggie was getting the max.There was no question reggie jackson was going to get a big deal when he was getting bumped for dion waiters? When he bombed as a starter in okc? When he was on the bench in 4th quarters for Spencer dinwiddie? When he was shooting 33% from the field?
I'm out yall. Good nite
Chris Palmer is wylin dude used to get paid for being a professional idiot
Reggie Jsckson is a backup PG. nothing more or less. He needs to accept that.
If I had to guess who repped that post it'd be someone who legit thought it was funny or someone who doesn't like Wooster.
Same thing goes with people reppinf posts of those Debating Reggie with me, people who dislike me are reppiing those posts.
Awesome probably reps every post that goes against what I say
Want to get a rep from awesome, snap on a-friend.
Who knew Reggie Jackson of all people could cause such a heated discussion.
you and I never agree until now. Agree ...You might be one of the worst posters I've seen in awhile
15 people came in and said Reggie Jackson gambled.
2 say no.
The latrell argument is a good one on someone gambling and losing.
I'm just glad a-friend left or got banned from the cfb thread
but hell every time I come in here he has half the replies on every god damn page
Reggie is def not a max contract player. I'm not hating, let him get that money.
However, that's how a team ends up with a bad contract.