- 2,900
- 599
- Joined
- May 24, 2014
That's why I had to refute that. I'm not ugly.ya boy called you ugly... Because Jackson has a face only a mother could love
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That's why I had to refute that. I'm not ugly.ya boy called you ugly... Because Jackson has a face only a mother could love
He has a family to feedDesmond was out of his asterisk mind to turn down that contract.Reggie definitely gambled on himself turning down $48M
for example, Ian Desmond on the Nationals turned down $100M before the season & is probably not gonna get that anymore because of his piss poor performance this season.
Nats lucked out huge.
In that respect, every player who doesn't sign an extension is gambling. Every player who signs a one year deal is gambling. These are givens bruh.
Reggie getting more money was a given, if he remained healthy.
We all know being healthy is a part of the game.
If this is the gamble you are now resorting to then, you win again.
Reggie getting more money was a given, if he remained healthy.
the times ive seen him hes never impressed me.Man stop this. He was TRASH, in a contract year, until monroe got hurt, and he got hot, for two weeks
Well, Reggie, thank Monroe for your 5/80 contract because, if it weren't from him Detroit FO wouldn't have seen your skills, and they surely wouldn't have paid you 5/80.
Who can we thank for the 4/43 contract he turned down.
Who was responsible for that offer? I can't imagine Reggie had anything to do with that if he had nothing to do with the 5/80
Simpletons, you guys are being simpletons if this is now your argument for the "gamble"
Reggie got paid what he was going to get paid, if I'm the only one not surprised by his contract, then I'm Surprised.
Swaggy P a fool
Well, Reggie, thank Monroe for your 5/80 contract because, if it weren't from him Detroit FO wouldn't have seen your skills, and they surely wouldn't have paid you 5/80.
Who can we thank for the 4/43 contract he turned down.
Who was responsible for that offer? I can't imagine Reggie had anything to do with that if he had nothing to do with the 5/80
He has a family to feedDesmond was out of his asterisk mind to turn down that contract.Reggie definitely gambled on himself turning down $48M
for example, Ian Desmond on the Nationals turned down $100M before the season & is probably not gonna get that anymore because of his piss poor performance this season.
Nats lucked out huge.
Can't wait til Bummy P disappears from this great city.
ignant plain and simple.
Reggie definitely gambled on himself turning down $48M
for example, Ian Desmond on the Nationals turned down $100M before the season
Desmond was out of his asterisk mind to turn down that contract.
Nats lucked out huge.
He has a family to feed
View media item 1615151
Reggie is a good enough player so I don't see much chance of him flopping after the trade.no reason why you should be such a hater.Yea, that gamble sounds like this....
Boss: You're going to work more hours and be in a leadership role
Employee: cool, I'm ready.
Boss: You go from $7 to $8
Employee: Nah, I think this role pays $15
Boss: You're right. How about $15 per hour then.
Employee: Sounds Great
What a gamble
You must be all in Yahoo comments complaining about why Doug McDermott didn't get more touches.
Sit down my g.
Turning down 50M because you think your better than that...
Requesting a trade to a team where if you flop, you could probably be relegated to being a bench player or out of the league in 2 years...
Playing well and getting a contact that's almost 60% greater...
That is the very definition of a gamble
Reggie is a good enough player so I don't see much chance of him flopping after the trade.
The only gamble is if he got injured.
Because JRS is also right.
GSW caught the best break since the 300 men of Sparta who had that narrow corridor to use against the mighty Persians
It's Detroit though. So you can't blame when I was barely watching any games at all being a Knicks fan.Reggie is a good enough player so I don't see much chance of him flopping after the trade.
The only gamble is if he got injured.
You guys clearly clearly CLEARLY were not keeping up with reggie when he went to detroit. Clearly. He hadn't even proven himself as a starter when given a chance to start the year in okc. Bruh was shooting like complete ****. Had the season ended two weeks earlier I couldn't see any team signing him up to be their starter